Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 18, 2022

Hoffman v. Kashi Sales, L.L.C.

Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Docket
7:21-cv-09642
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureMotion to Dismiss
In one sentence

In Hoffman v. Kashi Sales, L.L.C., Judge Briccetti ordered Hoffman to choose whether to amend his complaint before Kashi’s dismissal motion proceeds.

Who this affects

The order directly affects Peter Hoffman and Kashi Sales, L.L.C.; it also concerns the people Hoffman seeks to represent, although the opinion does not state that any class has been certified.

What happened

In Hoffman v. Kashi Sales, L.L.C., Peter Hoffman brought a case individually and on behalf of others similarly situated against Kashi Sales, L.L.C.

Kashi moved to dismiss the complaint on April 15, 2022. The court did not decide that motion in this order.

The court ordered Hoffman to notify it by April 25 whether he would file an amended complaint or rely on the existing complaint. Judge Briccetti also set deadlines for either path.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Hoffman v. Kashi Sales, L.L.C. · No. 7:21-cv-09642
Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Date
Apr. 18, 2022

Background

Peter Hoffman brought the action individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated against Kashi Sales, L.L.C. The opinion does not describe the claims or the alleged facts.

Motion and Order

On April 15, 2022, Kashi moved to dismiss the complaint. The court ordered Hoffman to notify the court by April 25 whether he intended to file an amended complaint in response to the motion or would rely on the complaint already being challenged.

If Hoffman chose not to amend, the dismissal motion would proceed under the ordinary briefing schedule. The court stated that it was unlikely to give Hoffman another opportunity to amend to address deficiencies made apparent by the fully briefed motion.

If Hoffman chose to amend, he had to file the amended complaint within 14 days after notifying the court. Within 21 days after the amendment, Kashi could answer, move to dismiss the amended complaint, or notify the court that it would rely on its original motion to dismiss.

Disposition

This order did not grant or deny Kashi’s motion to dismiss. It directed Hoffman to choose how to proceed and established deadlines for either filing an amended complaint or continuing with the existing complaint. Judge Vincent L. Briccetti issued the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.