Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 25, 2022

Cisneros v. Sea & Salt Seafood Corp.

Judge
Andrew Carter
Docket
1:20-cv-04001
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

In Cisneros v. Sea & Salt Seafood, Judge Carter approved the parties’ settlement and dismissed the case with prejudice.

Who this affects

Teotimo Cisneros, Sea & Salt Seafood Corp., Su Yong Lee, and any others covered by the approved settlement; the opinion does not describe the settlement’s terms.

What happened

In Cisneros v. Sea & Salt Seafood Corp., Teotimo Cisneros sued Sea & Salt Seafood Corp. and Su Yong Lee on behalf of himself and others similarly situated. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims.

The parties submitted a revised settlement agreement. The court reviewed it as required and found that it was fair and reasonable, so it approved the settlement.

Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. ordered the entire case dismissed with prejudice, without fees or costs except as the parties agreed. He also directed the court clerk to close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Cisneros v. Sea & Salt Seafood Corp. · No. 1:20-cv-04001
Judge
Andrew Carter
Date
Apr. 25, 2022

Background

Teotimo Cisneros brought the case on behalf of himself and others similarly situated against Sea & Salt Seafood Corp. and Su Yong Lee. The opinion does not state the underlying legal claims or provide the settlement’s terms.

Settlement Review

The parties submitted a revised settlement agreement. The court reviewed the agreement under Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., which requires review of certain employment-related settlements in federal court. The court found the agreement fair and reasonable and approved it.

Disposition

Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. ordered that the case be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety, without fees or costs except as agreed by the parties. The clerk was directed to close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.