Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 3, 2022

PKOH NYC, LLC v. The Bottle Crew, LLC

Judge
Valerie Caproni
Docket
1:22-cv-03495
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In PKOH NYC v. The Bottle Crew, Judge Caproni ordered citizenship details to confirm federal jurisdiction.

Who this affects

PKOH NYC, LLC must provide information about the citizenship of the members of both PKOH NYC, LLC and The Bottle Crew, LLC so the court can assess its subject-matter jurisdiction.

What happened

In PKOH NYC, LLC v. The Bottle Crew, LLC, PKOH NYC sued The Bottle Crew and said federal jurisdiction existed because the parties were citizens of different states. Both parties are limited liability companies.

The court said an LLC’s citizenship depends on the citizenship of each member. PKOH NYC had not provided the citizenship of its members or The Bottle Crew’s members.

Judge Valerie Caproni ordered PKOH NYC to update the court about both LLCs’ members by May 5, 2022, so the court could determine whether it had subject-matter jurisdiction.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
PKOH NYC, LLC v. The Bottle Crew, LLC · No. 1:22-cv-03495
Judge
Valerie Caproni
Date
May 3, 2022

Background

PKOH NYC, LLC filed the lawsuit on April 29, 2022. The complaint alleged that the court had subject-matter jurisdiction—legal authority to hear the case—because the parties had different citizenships.

Jurisdictional issue

The court explained that determining an LLC’s citizenship requires identifying the citizenship of each of its members. PKOH NYC had not pleaded the citizenship of its members, and it also had not pleaded the citizenship of the members of The Bottle Crew, LLC.

Order

The court ordered PKOH NYC to submit an update by May 5, 2022, stating the citizenship of the members of both LLCs. The purpose was to allow the court to determine whether it had subject-matter jurisdiction. The order did not decide the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.