Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 6, 2022

Cifuentes v. Center for Recovery & Wellness Educational Alliance

Judge
Paul Gardephe
Docket
1:22-cv-03552
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedureEmploymentPro Se
In one sentence

In Cifuentes v. Center for Recovery & Wellness, Judge Gardephe ordered summonses issued and U.S. Marshals service for Cifuentes’s national-origin discrimination case.

Who this affects

Cynthia Cifuentes and the three named defendants—Center for Recovery & Wellness: Educational Alliance, Suzette Ross, and Human Resources of Educational Alliance—are affected by the court’s service instructions.

What happened

Cynthia Cifuentes, who is representing herself, sued Center for Recovery & Wellness: Educational Alliance, Suzette Ross, and Human Resources of Educational Alliance. She alleges that her former employer discriminated against her because of her national origin under federal, New York State, and New York City laws.

The court had already allowed Cifuentes to proceed without paying filing fees in advance. Because she could not arrange service before the court reviewed her complaint and issued summonses, the court extended the service deadline to 90 days after the summonses are issued.

Judge Paul G. Gardephe directed the Clerk of Court to issue summonses, complete service forms, and give the necessary documents to the U.S. Marshals Service for service on the defendants. The order also required Cifuentes to notify the court if her address changes. The order addressed service only and did not decide whether her discrimination claims were legally valid.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Cifuentes v. Center for Recovery & Wellness Educational Alliance · No. 1:22-cv-03552
Judge
Paul Gardephe
Date
May 6, 2022

Background

Cynthia Cifuentes, proceeding without a lawyer, brought claims against Center for Recovery & Wellness: Educational Alliance; Suzette Ross, identified in the caption as a former supervisor; and Human Resources of Educational Alliance. She alleges that her former employer discriminated against her based on her national origin. The opinion states that she brought claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the New York State Human Rights Law, and the New York City Human Rights Law.

By an order dated May 3, 2022, the court granted Cifuentes permission to proceed without prepaying filing fees. This status allows a plaintiff to rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants.

Service of process

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 generally requires service of the summons and complaint within 90 days after the complaint is filed. The court explained that Cifuentes could not have served the defendants before the court reviewed the complaint and ordered that summonses be issued. The court therefore extended the service period until 90 days after the summonses are issued. It stated that Cifuentes should request an extension if the complaint is not served within that period.

Order

Judge Paul G. Gardephe instructed the Clerk of Court to issue summonses for all three defendants, complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for each defendant using the listed addresses, and deliver the necessary paperwork to the Marshals Service. The Clerk was also directed to mail Cifuentes an information package.

The court required Cifuentes to notify it in writing if her address changes and stated that the action may be dismissed if she fails to do so. This order concerns service of process and does not decide the merits of Cifuentes’s discrimination claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.