Garcia De Leon v. New York University
- Colleen McMahon
- 1:21-cv-05005
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
Garcia De Leon v. New York University: NYU asked Judge McMahon to seal materials supporting its opposition to class certification.
NYU, the plaintiff, the parties’ counsel, and members of the public seeking access to the court filings could be affected by the requested sealing and redactions.
What happened
In Garcia De Leon v. New York University, NYU asked to file under seal its opposition to the plaintiff’s motion for class certification and related declarations and exhibits. NYU said the materials contained personal identifying information, protected health information, and sensitive commercial information.
NYU said it would publicly file redacted versions and argued that privacy, health, educational, and commercial confidentiality interests justified sealing. The plaintiff’s counsel consented to the request.
The provided text is a letter requesting sealing, not a court order. It does not show whether Judge Colleen McMahon granted or denied the request.
The detailed version
- Garcia De Leon v. New York University · No. 1:21-cv-05005
- Colleen McMahon
- May 9, 2022
Background
The provided text is a May 6, 2022 letter from New York University (NYU), through its lawyer, to Judge Colleen McMahon. NYU requested permission to file under seal its opposition to the plaintiff’s motion for class certification and appointment of class representatives and class counsel. NYU also sought to seal certain declarations and exhibits accompanying that opposition.
Arguments for sealing
NYU said the materials contained three categories of information: the plaintiff’s personal identifying information in NYU’s records, the plaintiff’s protected health information, and sensitive commercial information designated confidential under a confidentiality agreement and stipulated protective order. NYU acknowledged that court filings generally carry a strong presumption of public access but argued that the privacy and confidentiality interests here justified sealing. NYU cited decisions discussing educational and student information, medical records and health information, and confidential business information.
NYU stated that it would publicly file redacted versions of the documents, leaving unredacted information that the parties agreed was not confidential. It also stated that disclosure could expose private, nonpublic, and commercially sensitive information. According to the letter, the plaintiff’s counsel consented to the request.
Disposition
The provided text contains NYU’s request but no ruling by Judge McMahon. It therefore does not establish whether the request to file under seal was granted, denied, or otherwise resolved.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.