Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.OtherFiled May 9, 2022

Garcia De Leon v. New York University

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:21-cv-05005
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

Garcia De Leon v. New York University: NYU asked Judge McMahon to seal materials supporting its opposition to class certification.

Who this affects

NYU, the plaintiff, the parties’ counsel, and members of the public seeking access to the court filings could be affected by the requested sealing and redactions.

What happened

In Garcia De Leon v. New York University, NYU asked to file under seal its opposition to the plaintiff’s motion for class certification and related declarations and exhibits. NYU said the materials contained personal identifying information, protected health information, and sensitive commercial information.

NYU said it would publicly file redacted versions and argued that privacy, health, educational, and commercial confidentiality interests justified sealing. The plaintiff’s counsel consented to the request.

The provided text is a letter requesting sealing, not a court order. It does not show whether Judge Colleen McMahon granted or denied the request.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Garcia De Leon v. New York University · No. 1:21-cv-05005
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
May 9, 2022

Background

The provided text is a May 6, 2022 letter from New York University (NYU), through its lawyer, to Judge Colleen McMahon. NYU requested permission to file under seal its opposition to the plaintiff’s motion for class certification and appointment of class representatives and class counsel. NYU also sought to seal certain declarations and exhibits accompanying that opposition.

Arguments for sealing

NYU said the materials contained three categories of information: the plaintiff’s personal identifying information in NYU’s records, the plaintiff’s protected health information, and sensitive commercial information designated confidential under a confidentiality agreement and stipulated protective order. NYU acknowledged that court filings generally carry a strong presumption of public access but argued that the privacy and confidentiality interests here justified sealing. NYU cited decisions discussing educational and student information, medical records and health information, and confidential business information.

NYU stated that it would publicly file redacted versions of the documents, leaving unredacted information that the parties agreed was not confidential. It also stated that disclosure could expose private, nonpublic, and commercially sensitive information. According to the letter, the plaintiff’s counsel consented to the request.

Disposition

The provided text contains NYU’s request but no ruling by Judge McMahon. It therefore does not establish whether the request to file under seal was granted, denied, or otherwise resolved.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.