Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 10, 2022

Bynum v. Pasenti Inc

Judge
Philip Halpern
Docket
7:21-cv-04817
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureEmployment
In one sentence

In Bynum v. Pasenti Inc, Judge Halpern granted an extension, giving the parties until May 23, 2022, to file settlement materials.

Who this affects

The parties, including plaintiff Star Bynum, are affected by the new May 23, 2022 deadline for filing the settlement agreement and joint statement.

What happened

In Bynum v. Pasenti Inc, plaintiff Star Bynum’s lawyer asked for two more weeks to file a motion seeking settlement approval. The lawyer said more time was needed to finalize the settlement agreement and that no earlier extension had been requested.

The court granted the application. It gave the parties until May 23, 2022, to file the settlement agreement and a joint statement under the procedure cited in the order.

Judge Halpern also directed the Clerk of Court to terminate the motion sequence at ECF 41. The order does not decide the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Bynum v. Pasenti Inc · No. 7:21-cv-04817
Judge
Philip Halpern
Date
May 10, 2022

Background

The opinion is an order addressing a request for additional time. Counsel for plaintiff Star Bynum wrote that the firm represented Bynum and asked for a two-week extension of the May 9, 2022 deadline to file a motion for settlement approval. Counsel stated that additional time was needed to finalize the settlement agreement and that no prior request for an extension had been made.

Ruling

The court granted the application. The parties were given until May 23, 2022, to file the settlement agreement and a joint statement pursuant to the procedure cited in the order, Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc. The Clerk of Court was directed to terminate the motion sequence at ECF 41.

Effect

This order changes the deadline for filing the identified settlement materials. It does not resolve the underlying claims or state whether the settlement itself was approved.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.