Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 12, 2022

JOHNSON v. BROSNAN RISK CONSULTANTS

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:22-cv-03805
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Johnson v. Brosnan Risk Consultants, Judge Swain dismissed the action without prejudice because Johnson did not obtain required filing permission.

Who this affects

Robert W. Johnson’s action was dismissed without prejudice, while Brosnan Risk Consultants was not required to litigate the underlying claims in this proceeding.

What happened

Robert W. Johnson sued Brosnan Risk Consultants in the Southern District of New York. Johnson was representing himself and had not paid the filing fees or submitted an application to proceed without paying them.

A 2020 court order barred Johnson from filing a new civil action without first obtaining permission from the court. Because he had not obtained that permission, the court dismissed this action without prejudice for violating the earlier order.

Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain also ruled that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied Johnson permission to appeal without paying the required fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
JOHNSON v. BROSNAN RISK CONSULTANTS · No. 1:22-cv-03805
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
May 12, 2022

Background

Robert W. Johnson filed this action without a lawyer. He originally filed it in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, which transferred it to the Southern District of New York on May 2, 2022.

The opinion states that, on July 10, 2020, Johnson had been barred from filing any new civil action in the Southern District of New York without first obtaining the court’s permission to file. Johnson had not paid the fees required to bring this action and had not filed an application to proceed without paying those fees. Because he had not paid the fees, the court treated his complaint as a request to proceed without paying them. He still had not obtained the required permission to file.

Ruling

The court dismissed the action without prejudice because Johnson failed to comply with the July 10, 2020 order. The opinion did not address the underlying claims against Brosnan Risk Consultants.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied Johnson permission to appeal without paying the required fees. Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.