Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 19, 2022

Spencer Nimham El Dey v. DOC

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:22-cv-04027
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Abdullah Spencer Nimham El Dey v. DOC, Judge Swain ordered payment or completed fee-waiver forms within 30 days.

Who this affects

Abdullah Spencer Nimham El Dey, who was required to pay the filing fees or submit the required forms before the action could proceed.

What happened

Abdullah Spencer Nimham El Dey v. DOC concerns a lawsuit filed without a lawyer by a person the opinion says is detained at Rikers Island. The filing included an unsigned application to proceed without paying fees upfront and no authorization for prisoner-account deductions.

The court gave the plaintiff 30 days to either pay the $402 filing and administrative fees or submit completed, signed forms requesting permission to proceed without paying fees upfront. No summons would issue at that time, and the action would be dismissed if he did not comply.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain also ruled that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying fees. The order did not decide the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Spencer Nimham El Dey v. DOC · No. 1:22-cv-04027
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
May 19, 2022

Background

Abdullah Spencer Nimham El Dey filed this civil action without a lawyer. The opinion says he is currently detained at Rikers Island. To proceed with a civil action, a prisoner must either pay $402 in fees—a $350 filing fee and a $52 administrative fee—or submit a signed application to proceed without prepaying fees, commonly called an IFP application, along with a prisoner authorization.

The prisoner authorization allows deductions from the prisoner's account toward the $350 filing fee and requires certified copies of account statements for the previous six months. The $52 administrative fee does not apply to a person granted permission to proceed without prepaying fees.

Order

The plaintiff submitted an unsigned fee-waiver application and did not submit a prisoner authorization. The court ordered him, within 30 days of the order, to either pay the $402 in fees or complete and submit the attached fee-waiver application and prisoner authorization. The documents were to identify docket number 22-CV-4027 (LTS).

No summons was to issue at that time. If the plaintiff complied, the case would be processed under the Clerk's Office procedures. If he failed to comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed.

Appeal and additional warning

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The court also cautioned that a prisoner's action or appeal dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim can count as a qualifying dismissal, or “strike,” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). After three such strikes, a prisoner generally cannot proceed without prepaying fees in new federal civil actions unless the imminent-danger exception applies.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the order. The opinion does not address the merits of the plaintiff's underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.