Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 26, 2022

Sanchez v. 2050 Valentine Avenue LLC

Judge
Stewart Aaron
Docket
1:21-cv-06305
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
FlsaFee PetitionCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Sanchez v. 2050 Valentine Avenue LLC, Judge Aaron approved the Fair Labor Standards Act settlement and dismissed the action with prejudice.

Who this affects

Raphy Sanchez, 2050 Valentine Avenue LLC, and the other defendants were affected by the approved settlement and dismissal of the action.

What happened

In Sanchez v. 2050 Valentine Avenue LLC, the parties told the court they had reached a settlement covering all issues in the Fair Labor Standards Act case. The court reviewed the proposed agreement as required before approving it.

The court found the settlement fair and reasonable considering the plaintiff’s individual claims, the risks of continued litigation, and the likely expenses. It also approved $12,819 in attorney’s fees and $542 in costs, while making no finding about the reasonableness of the attorneys’ hourly rates.

Judge Stewart D. Aaron approved the settlement and dismissed the action with prejudice, without costs except as provided in the settlement agreement. The Clerk of Court was asked to close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Sanchez v. 2050 Valentine Avenue LLC · No. 1:21-cv-06305
Judge
Stewart Aaron
Date
May 26, 2022

Background

Raphy Sanchez brought claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act against 2050 Valentine Avenue LLC and other defendants. On March 7, 2022, the parties informed the court that they had reached a settlement in principle covering all issues. The court then directed them to submit the settlement agreement and explain why it was fair, reasonable, and adequate.

The parties submitted the signed settlement agreement and a motion seeking approval. The case had been referred to Judge Stewart D. Aaron for disposition with the parties’ consent under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

Court’s analysis

The court reviewed the proposed settlement and found it fair and reasonable in light of the nature and scope of Sanchez’s individual claims, along with the risks and expenses of additional litigation.

Sanchez also requested approval of $12,819 in attorney’s fees—described as one-third of the settlement amount after costs—and $542 in costs. The court stated that courts in the district typically approve attorney’s fees equal to one-third of the total recovery and found the requested fees fair and reasonable. The court expressly made no finding about whether counsel’s hourly rates were reasonable.

Disposition

The court approved the settlement. It dismissed the action with prejudice and without costs except as provided in the settlement agreement, and requested that the Clerk of Court close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.