Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 25, 2023

Scott v. United Cerebral Palsy Associations Of New York State, Inc.

Judge
Stewart Aaron
Docket
1:22-cv-07427
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
FlsaFee PetitionCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Scott v. United Cerebral, Judge Aaron approved the parties’ Fair Labor Standards Act settlement, including fees and costs, and dismissed the action with prejudice.

Who this affects

The order affected Nichole Scott and United Cerebral Palsy Associations Of New York State, Inc. by approving their settlement, approving the specified costs and attorney’s fees, and dismissing the action with prejudice.

What happened

In Scott v. United Cerebral Palsy Associations Of New York State, Inc., Nichole Scott and the defendant reached a settlement covering all issues after mediation. They asked the court to approve it as fair and reasonable.

The court approved the settlement and also approved $477 in costs and $4,841 in attorney’s fees. The action was dismissed with prejudice and without costs, except as provided in the settlement agreement.

Judge Stewart D. Aaron ruled that the settlement was fair and reasonable based on the nature and scope of Scott’s individual claims and the risks and expenses of continued litigation.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Scott v. United Cerebral Palsy Associations Of New York State, Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-07427
Judge
Stewart Aaron
Date
Jan. 25, 2023

Background

Nichole Scott brought claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act against United Cerebral Palsy Associations Of New York State, Inc. After mediation, the parties reached a settlement resolving all issues. They submitted the proposed settlement agreement and asked the court to approve it as fair, reasonable, and adequate.

Court’s Analysis

The court reviewed the proposed settlement and found it fair and reasonable. It considered the nature and scope of Scott’s individual claims, along with the risks and expenses involved in further litigation.

Scott also sought approval of $477 in costs and $4,841 in attorney’s fees. The opinion states that the fee request represented one-third of the total settlement amount after costs. The court noted that courts in the Southern District of New York typically approve attorney’s fees equal to one-third of the total recovery and found the requested fees fair and reasonable.

Disposition

The court approved the settlement. It dismissed the action with prejudice and without costs except as provided in the settlement agreement.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.