Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 31, 2022

Rizzo v. New York State

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:22-cv-04088
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Rizzo v. New York State, Judge Swain transferred the excessive-force case to the Northern District of New York because the events occurred there.

Who this affects

Jonathan Rizzo, the named correction-officer defendants, and the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision; the case was transferred from the Southern District of New York to the Northern District of New York.

What happened

Rizzo v. New York State concerns Jonathan Rizzo’s claim that four correction officers at Upstate Correctional Facility used excessive force against him and injured him. He brought the case without a lawyer in the Southern District of New York.

The court concluded that the Southern District was not the proper federal district because the alleged events occurred at Upstate, in Franklin County, which is in the Northern District of New York. The court therefore transferred the action rather than dismissing it.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain directed the clerk to transfer the case to the Northern District of New York and closed the case in the Southern District. The transferee court will decide whether Rizzo may continue without paying filing fees; no summons will issue from the Southern District, and the court denied no-fee status for an appeal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Rizzo v. New York State · No. 1:22-cv-04088
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
May 31, 2022

Background

Jonathan Rizzo, who was incarcerated at Upstate Correctional Facility, filed this action without a lawyer. He alleged that four John Doe correction officers at Upstate used excessive force against him on January 23, 2022, and caused injuries. He also named New York State’s Department of Corrections and Community Supervision as a defendant.

Venue analysis

The court addressed whether the case was filed in the proper federal district, a question known as venue. Rizzo did not allege where the individual defendants lived. The complaint alleged, however, that the events occurred at Upstate, which is in Malone, Franklin County, New York. Franklin County is within the Northern District of New York.

The court concluded that the Southern District of New York was not a proper venue under the federal venue statute. It determined that the claims arose in Franklin County and that the action could have been brought in the Northern District of New York. Under the statute governing cases filed in the wrong venue, a court may transfer the case when doing so serves the interests of justice.

The opinion also states that the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, as an arm of New York State, is protected by the Eleventh Amendment from damages suits in federal court. The court said that naming that agency did not change its venue determination.

Disposition

Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered the clerk to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York. The order closed the case in the Southern District of New York. It states that the transferee court must decide whether Rizzo may proceed without paying filing fees, and that no summons would issue from the Southern District. The court certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The opinion did not decide whether the alleged excessive force occurred or whether Rizzo’s claims otherwise succeed.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.