Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 31, 2022

Booker v. Flint

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:22-cv-04024
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Booker v. Flint, Judge Swain transferred Booker’s constitutional-rights case to the Northern District of New York because the events occurred there.

Who this affects

Diqan Booker, Sgt. Flint, Officer Murphy, Officer Hobbs, and the federal courts handling the action.

What happened

In Booker v. Flint, Diquan Booker, who was incarcerated at Washington Correctional Facility, sued Sgt. Flint, Officer Murphy, and Officer Hobbs under a federal civil-rights law. He alleged that they violated his constitutional rights, and he filed the case in the Southern District of New York.

The court explained that the events behind Booker’s claims occurred at Washington Correctional Facility, which is in Washington County, in the Northern District of New York. The court said it was unclear where the defendants lived, but even if venue was proper in the Southern District, the Northern District was also a proper and more convenient place for the case because the relevant witnesses and documents were expected to be there.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered the case transferred to the Northern District of New York. The order closed the Southern District case, directed that no summons issue there, left any decision about proceeding without paying filing fees to the receiving court, and denied fee-free status for an appeal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Booker v. Flint · No. 1:22-cv-04024
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
May 31, 2022

Background

Diquan Booker filed this pro se action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a law allowing claims for violations of federal constitutional rights by people acting under state law. Booker sued Sgt. Flint, Officer Murphy, and Officer Hobbs. He alleged that the defendants violated his constitutional rights at Washington Correctional Facility, where he was incarcerated.

Venue and Transfer

Venue means the federal district where a case may properly be heard. The court noted that Booker did not identify where any defendant resided, so it was unclear whether venue was proper in the Southern District of New York based on the defendants’ residences. The court stated, however, that the events giving rise to the claims occurred at Washington Correctional Facility, which is located in Washington County in the Northern District of New York. Venue was therefore proper in the Northern District based on where the events occurred.

The court applied 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), which permits transfer to another district where the case could have been brought when transfer would be more convenient for the parties and witnesses and would serve the interests of justice. The court found transfer appropriate because the underlying events occurred at Washington Correctional Facility and reasonably expected that the relevant documents and witnesses would also be there.

Disposition

The court transferred the action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York. The Clerk of Court was directed to carry out the transfer. The court stated that the receiving court would decide whether Booker could proceed without prepaying fees, directed that no summons issue from the Southern District, and ordered that the case be closed there. The court also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.