Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 3, 2022

Laba v. JBO Worldwide Supply Pty Ltd

Judge
Alvin Hellerstein
Docket
1:20-cv-03443
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureEvidence
In one sentence

In Laba v. JBO Worldwide Supply, Judge Hellerstein denied a motion to seal documents because no party sought continued sealing.

Who this affects

The parties and public access to the documents discussed in ECF No. 176.

What happened

Laba v. JBO Worldwide Supply Pty Ltd involved documents filed with a motion to sanction Remi Laba and Laba’s opposition cross-motion for sanctions. JBO Worldwide Supply filed a letter giving the parties an opportunity to explain why the documents should remain sealed.

Under the judge’s rules, a request to keep the documents sealed had to be filed within three days. Neither Laba nor any other party made that request.

In Laba v. JBO Worldwide Supply Pty Ltd, Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein ruled that court records are generally open to the public and denied the motion to seal. He also directed the Clerk to terminate ECF No. 176.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Laba v. JBO Worldwide Supply Pty Ltd · No. 1:20-cv-03443
Judge
Alvin Hellerstein
Date
June 3, 2022

Background

JBO Worldwide Supply filed a January 24, 2022 letter discussing documents connected to its motion to sanction Remi Laba and its opposition to Laba’s cross-motion for sanctions. The letter gave Laba and any other party an opportunity to provide a basis for keeping the documents under seal.

Sealing Request

Under Rule 4(B)(ii) of Judge Hellerstein’s Individual Rules, a letter seeking to keep the materials sealed had to be filed within three days after JBO Worldwide Supply filed ECF No. 176. Neither Laba nor any other party filed such a letter or otherwise sought to maintain the documents under seal.

Ruling

The court stated that court records and documents are presumptively open to public inspection and that no party had taken action to overcome that presumption. Judge Hellerstein therefore denied the motion to seal and directed the Clerk to terminate ECF No. 176.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.