Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 6, 2022

Perez Salguero v. CM Enterprises of Rockland Inc

Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Docket
7:22-cv-00411
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
FlsaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Perez Salguero v. CM Enterprises, Judge Briccetti approved the settlement and dismissed the Fair Labor Standards Act case without prejudice, allowing restoration only if requested by August 8, 2022.

Who this affects

Erodita Xiomara Perez Salguero and defendants CM Enterprises of Rockland Inc. and Michelle Worab; the settlement resolved the wage-and-hour case subject to the stated deadline for requesting restoration.

What happened

In Perez Salguero v. CM Enterprises of Rockland Inc., plaintiff Erodita Xiomara Perez Salguero filed a proposed settlement in her Fair Labor Standards Act case against CM Enterprises of Rockland Inc., doing business as Luigi O’Gradys Deli and Catering, and Michelle Worab.

The court found the settlement fair and reasonable and the result of arm’s-length negotiations, rather than fraud or collusion. It also found that the attorneys’ fees—one-third of the plaintiff’s net recovery, plus reimbursement of costs—were fair and reasonable.

Judge Vincent L. Briccetti approved the settlement and dismissed the action without prejudice to restoring it to the court’s calendar. Any request to restore the case had to be filed by August 8, 2022; the Clerk was instructed to close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Perez Salguero v. CM Enterprises of Rockland Inc · No. 7:22-cv-00411
Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Date
June 6, 2022

Background

Erodita Xiomara Perez Salguero brought this Fair Labor Standards Act case against CM Enterprises of Rockland Inc., doing business as Luigi O’Gradys Deli and Catering, and Michelle Worab. On June 2, 2022, Perez Salguero filed a settlement agreement and a statement explaining its basis, as required by the Court of Appeals’ decision in Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc.

Settlement Review

The court considered Perez Salguero’s position that the settlement was fair and adequate; the risks and costs of continuing the litigation; her representation by counsel; the fact that she no longer worked for the defendants; the release’s limitation to wage-and-hour claims that accrued before the agreement was signed; and the mutual nature of the non-disparagement provision.

Based on those factors, the court found that the settlement was fair and reasonable and resulted from arm’s-length negotiation, without fraud or collusion. The court also found reasonable the attorneys’ fees, which were one-third of Perez Salguero’s net recovery, along with reimbursement of costs.

Ruling

Judge Vincent L. Briccetti approved the parties’ settlement agreement. The action was dismissed without prejudice to the right to restore it to the court’s calendar, but any request to restore the action had to be filed no later than August 8, 2022. The court stated that a later request could be denied solely because it was untimely. The Clerk was instructed to close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.