Alonzo v. Peekskill Automotive Inc.
- Vincent Briccetti
- 7:22-cv-05486
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Alonzo v. Peekskill Automotive, Judge Briccetti approved the parties’ Fair Labor Standards Act settlement and closed the case.
Jose Alvarez Alonzo and Peekskill Automotive Inc.; the approved settlement resolves the filed case and addresses Alonzo’s FLSA and New York Labor Law claims.
What happened
In Jose Alvarez Alonzo v. Peekskill Automotive Inc., the parties submitted a settlement agreement in a dispute under the Fair Labor Standards Act and related New York wage law claims. Alonzo was represented by an attorney experienced in wage and employment matters.
The court considered the parties’ information about the claimed unpaid overtime, the defendant’s financial condition, mediation, the scope of the release, and the absence of a confidentiality requirement. The agreement provided for a total payment of $22,000, and the court found the settlement fair, reasonable, and reached without fraud or collusion. The court also found that attorney’s fees equal to 40% of Alonzo’s total recovery, plus reimbursement of costs, were fair and reasonable.
Judge Vincent L. Briccetti approved the settlement agreement, canceled the scheduled case-management conference, and directed the Clerk to close the case.
The detailed version
- Alonzo v. Peekskill Automotive Inc. · No. 7:22-cv-05486
- Vincent Briccetti
- June 15, 2023
Background
Jose Alvarez Alonzo brought this wage-and-hour case under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The parties filed a settlement agreement and a statement explaining its basis, as required for court review of an FLSA settlement under the cited Second Circuit decision.
Settlement Review
The court reviewed the proposed agreement as a whole. It considered Alonzo’s statement that his initial damages estimate was based on memory rather than documented time records; the defendant’s evidence that the unpaid overtime was likely less than alleged; and the parties’ assessment, reached with help from a mediator, that $22,000 was fair in light of the evidence and the defendant’s financial condition.
The court also considered that Alonzo had experienced FLSA and employment counsel, that a neutral mediator assisted and encouraged the settlement, that the release was not overly broad, that the agreement had no confidentiality requirement, and that the parties wanted to avoid the costs and uncertainty of continued litigation. The released claims were limited to FLSA and New York Labor Law claims.
Attorney’s Fees
After reviewing counsel’s billing records and related information, the court found reasonable the attorney’s fees equal to 40% of Alonzo’s total recovery, together with reimbursement of costs.
Ruling and Disposition
The court found that the settlement was fair and reasonable and resulted from arm’s-length negotiations rather than fraud or collusion. Judge Vincent L. Briccetti approved the settlement agreement, canceled the June 27, 2023 case-management conference, and directed the Clerk to close the case.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.