Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 7, 2022

Burke v. The United States Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of New…

Full caption

Burke v. The United States Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of New York

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:22-cv-04219
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Burke v. United States Attorney’s Office, Judge Swain transferred Burke’s case to the Eastern District because the alleged events occurred there.

Who this affects

Kyle Julius Burke’s action was transferred from the Southern District of New York to the Eastern District of New York. The transferee court was left to decide whether he could proceed without prepaying filing fees, and the Southern District denied fee-free status for an appeal from this order.

What happened

In Burke v. The United States Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York, Kyle Julius Burke, representing himself, alleged that the office violated his rights in Brooklyn, New York, from May 21 through May 23, 2022.

The court concluded that the Eastern District of New York was a proper venue because the alleged events occurred there. It transferred the action to that district, directed that no summons issue from the Southern District, and closed the case there.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered the transfer. She also left the decision about whether Burke could proceed without paying filing fees to the transferee court and denied fee-free status for any appeal from the transfer order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Burke v. The United States Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of New… · No. 1:22-cv-04219
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
June 7, 2022

Background

Kyle Julius Burke, representing himself, brought an action against the United States Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York. He alleged that the office violated his rights in Brooklyn, in Kings County, New York, from May 21 through May 23, 2022. The opinion states that Burke lives in Brooklyn.

Venue and Transfer

The court explained that federal law generally permits a civil action to be filed where a defendant resides or where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred. The court said it was unclear whether venue in the Southern District of New York was proper under the defendant-residence provision. It concluded, however, that the Eastern District of New York was a proper venue because the alleged events occurred in Kings County, which is in that district.

The court also considered transfer for convenience and the interest of justice. It stated that the events occurred in the Eastern District and that relevant documents and witnesses were likely located there. Based on the totality of the circumstances, the court concluded that transfer was appropriate under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a).

Disposition

The court directed the Clerk to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. It stated that the transferee court would decide whether Burke could continue without prepaying filing fees. The Southern District court directed that a summons not issue from that court and stated that its order closed the case. The court also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal from the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.