Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 13, 2022

Antrobus v. Molina

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:22-cv-04780
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Antrobus v. Molina, Judge Swain ordered Andre Antrobus to pay fees or submit forms to proceed without prepayment, warning the case could be dismissed.

Who this affects

Andre Antrobus was required to pay the filing fees or submit the forms needed to request permission to proceed without prepaying fees; the action would be dismissed if he did not comply within 30 days.

What happened

Antrobus v. Molina concerns Andre Antrobus’s civil action against Commissioner Lewis A. Molina and Warden Caputo. Antrobus filed the complaint without paying the required fees and without submitting a completed application to proceed without prepaying fees or the required prisoner authorization.

The court gave Antrobus 30 days to pay $402 or submit the required forms. The $402 consists of a $350 filing fee and a $52 administrative fee; a person approved to proceed without prepayment does not owe the administrative fee. The court also said no summons would issue yet and warned that the action would be dismissed if Antrobus did not comply.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain issued the order on June 13, 2022. She also denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees, finding that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. The order did not decide the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Antrobus v. Molina · No. 1:22-cv-04780
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
June 13, 2022

Background

Andre Antrobus, who the opinion says is incarcerated at the Anna M. Kross Center, filed this civil action without a lawyer against Commissioner Lewis A. Molina and Warden Caputo. He submitted the complaint without paying the required fees and without a completed application to proceed without prepaying fees or a prisoner authorization.

Required Filing or Payment

The court explained that a prisoner who wants to proceed with a civil action must either pay $402—consisting of a $350 filing fee and a $52 administrative fee—or submit a signed application to proceed without prepaying fees and a prisoner authorization. The authorization allows deductions from the prisoner’s account toward the $350 filing fee and requires certified copies of the account statements for the prior six months. The $52 administrative fee does not apply to a person granted permission to proceed without prepaying fees.

The court ordered Antrobus, within 30 days of the order, to either pay the $402 or submit the required application and prisoner authorization, labeled with docket number 22-CV-4780 (LTS).

Ruling and Effect

The court directed payment of the fee or submission of the application and authorization. No summons would issue at that time. The court stated that, if Antrobus complied, the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office’s procedures; if he failed to comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed. The court did not address the merits of Antrobus’s claims.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain also certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The opinion cautioned that a later dismissal for frivolousness or failure to state a claim could count as a qualifying dismissal, or “strike,” under the prisoner-litigation statute, but it did not make such a dismissal here.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.