Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 13, 2022

Booker v. John Doe 8-4 Shift Correctional Officer

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:22-cv-04936
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Booker v. John Doe, Judge Swain transferred the prisoner’s constitutional-rights case to the Northern District of New York.

Who this affects

Diquan Booker and the two unnamed correctional-officer defendants are affected by the transfer. The case will proceed, if permitted by the transferee court, in the Northern District of New York rather than the Southern District of New York.

What happened

In Booker v. John Doe, Diquan Booker, who is incarcerated at Washington Correctional Facility, sued two unnamed correctional officers without a lawyer. He alleged that they violated his constitutional rights there.

The court said the events occurred at Washington Correctional Facility in Washington County, which is in the Northern District of New York. It also said that documents and witnesses would likely be there, making that district more convenient.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain transferred the case to the Northern District of New York. The Southern District of New York case was closed, and that court said the Northern District would decide whether Booker could continue without paying filing fees; it also denied fee-free status for any appeal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Booker v. John Doe 8-4 Shift Correctional Officer · No. 1:22-cv-04936
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
June 13, 2022

Background

Diquan Booker, who is incarcerated at Washington Correctional Facility in Comstock, New York, brought this action without a lawyer under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He alleged that two unnamed John Doe 8-4 shift correctional officers violated his federal constitutional rights at that facility.

Venue and transfer analysis

The court explained that venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2) in the district where a substantial part of the events occurred. Because the alleged events occurred at Washington Correctional Facility, located in Washington County in the Northern District of New York, venue was proper there. The court said it was unclear whether venue was proper in the Southern District of New York based on the defendants’ residences because Booker did not provide facts about those residences.

The court also applied 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), which permits transfer to another district for the convenience of the parties and witnesses and in the interest of justice, even when venue is proper in the original district. The court found transfer appropriate because the underlying events occurred at Washington Correctional Facility and it was reasonable to expect that relevant documents and witnesses would also be there. It concluded that the Northern District of New York appeared to be the more convenient forum.

Ruling

Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered the Clerk of Court to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York. The Southern District of New York case was closed, and no summons would issue from that court. The transferee court will decide whether Booker may proceed without prepaying fees. The court certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.