Butler v. The All American Bar on First Avenue Inc.
- Sarah Cave
- 1:21-cv-00164
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Butler v. The All American Bar, Judge Cave ordered the parties to submit materials supporting review of their Fair Labor Standards Act settlement.
The plaintiffs and defendants in the case, who were required to jointly submit materials concerning their settlement and the attorneys’ fees and costs.
What happened
In Butler v. The All American Bar on First Avenue Inc., the parties told the court that they had agreed to settle the case. The case includes claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal law governing certain wage and hour rights.
The court did not approve or reject the settlement. Instead, it required the parties to file a joint letter-motion by June 17, 2022, explaining why the settlement was fair and reasonable. The filing must discuss the claims, defenses, possible damages, the parties’ legal positions, settlement negotiations, and other relevant factors.
The parties must also provide information about the lawyers’ fees, billing records, costs, any fee agreement, and the settlement agreement itself. Judge Sarah L. Cave issued the order on June 13, 2022.
The detailed version
- Butler v. The All American Bar on First Avenue Inc. · No. 1:21-cv-00164
- Sarah Cave
- June 13, 2022
Background
The plaintiffs are Alla Butler, Ian Hannah, and Edith Zagrod. The defendants are The All American Bar on First Avenue Inc., 58 E. 34th St. Wings Lodge Inc., Robert J. Gerola, Jr., Robert O’Rourke, Claudine M. O’Rourke, and Louise Demarco. On June 2, 2022, the parties consented to have a United States magistrate judge handle the case for all purposes. On June 10, 2022, they informed the court that they had reached a settlement.
The case includes one or more claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Under the Second Circuit’s requirements for reviewing settlements in those cases, the court must evaluate whether the settlement is fair and reasonable before accepting it.
Order
The court ordered the parties to file a joint letter-motion by June 17, 2022. The submission must address the claims and defenses, the defendants’ potential monetary exposure and the basis for calculating it, the strengths and weaknesses of the plaintiffs’ case and the defendants’ defenses, reasons for any difference between the potential value of the claims and the settlement amount, the litigation and negotiation process, and other matters relevant to whether the settlement is reasonable. The parties may also address whether a judgment would be collectible if the case proceeded to trial.
The joint submission must explain the attorneys’ fee arrangement and include any retainer agreement, records showing the attorneys’ actual fees, documentation of costs, and a copy of the settlement agreement. The order required the parties to submit these materials; it did not state that the court had approved or rejected the settlement.
Disposition and Classification
The court ordered the parties to submit settlement materials. This is a procedural order because it concerns court review of a proposed settlement and does not decide the underlying claims.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.