Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 16, 2022

Lopez v. U.S. Department of the Interior

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:22-cv-04744
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Lopez v. U.S. Department of the Interior, Judge Swain ordered Mariah Lopez to submit an original signature before the case could proceed.

Who this affects

Mariah Lopez, whose action must have a properly signed fee application to proceed.

What happened

Lopez v. U.S. Department of the Interior concerns Mariah Lopez’s request to proceed without prepaying court fees and her request for emergency court orders. She filed the fee application without a signature.

The court ordered Lopez to submit the signature page with an original signature within 30 days. No summons will be issued yet. If she complies, the Clerk’s Office will process the case; if she does not, the action will be dismissed.

Judge Swain also ruled that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for any appeal from this order. The order did not decide Lopez’s request for emergency relief or the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Lopez v. U.S. Department of the Interior · No. 1:22-cv-04744
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
June 16, 2022

Background

Mariah Lopez filed this action without a lawyer. She sought a temporary restraining order and other injunctive relief. She also submitted an application to proceed without prepaying court fees, commonly called an application to proceed in forma pauperis, but the application did not contain a signature.

Order

The court relied on Rule 11(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the applicable local rule, which require an unrepresented party to sign pleadings, motions, and other court papers personally. The court explained that the required signature must be an original handwritten signature or a hand-placed mark.

The court directed Lopez to resubmit the application’s signature page with an original signature within 30 days of the order. No summons will issue at this time. If Lopez complies, the action will be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures. If she does not comply within the allowed time, the action will be dismissed.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for purposes of an appeal. The order did not address the merits of Lopez’s claims or decide her request for emergency relief.

Classification

This is a procedural order because it addresses a required signature and the processing of the fee application rather than deciding the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.