Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 17, 2022

Franklin v. Whole Foods Market Group, Inc.

Judge
Valerie Caproni
Docket
1:20-cv-04935
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Franklin v. Whole Foods, Judge Caproni dismissed the settled case with prejudice and without costs.

Who this affects

Henry Franklin and the other proposed class members, Whole Foods Market Group, Inc., and Amazon.com, Inc.; the case was closed after the parties reported an agreement in principle.

What happened

In Franklin v. Whole Foods Market Group, Inc., the court was told through mediation that the parties had reached an agreement in principle resolving all issues. The defendants were Whole Foods Market Group, Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc.

The court canceled all scheduled conferences and deadlines, dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, including attorneys’ fees, and directed the Clerk to close the case. The parties may ask to reopen the case within 30 days if they show good cause.

Judge Valerie Caproni also stated that the parties must submit their settlement agreement and request an order retaining jurisdiction if they want the court to enforce that agreement.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Franklin v. Whole Foods Market Group, Inc. · No. 1:20-cv-04935
Judge
Valerie Caproni
Date
June 17, 2022

Background

On June 15, 2022, the court was notified through mediation that the parties had reached an agreement in principle resolving all issues. The opinion does not provide the settlement’s terms.

Order

The court canceled all previously scheduled conferences and other deadlines. It dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, including attorneys’ fees, to either party. The Clerk of Court was directed to terminate all open motions and close the case.

Possible Reopening and Settlement Enforcement

The parties may apply to reopen the case within 30 days of the order. The application must show good cause for keeping the case open despite the settlement, and a late application or one without a showing of good cause may be denied on that basis.

If the parties want the court to retain jurisdiction—the authority to enforce their settlement agreement—they must, within the same 30-day period, submit the settlement agreement under Rule 7.A of the court’s Individual Practices and request an order expressly retaining jurisdiction to enforce it.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.