Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 23, 2022

M&K Imports, LLC v. Rejuveneda Medical Group, Inc.

Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Docket
7:22-cv-02606
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureMotion to Dismiss
In one sentence

In M&K Imports v. Rejuveneda, Judge Briccetti set deadlines for responding to a pending partial motion to dismiss.

Who this affects

M&K Imports, LLC and the defendants named in the action, particularly Rejuveneda Medical Group, Inc. and Thom E. Lobe, whose partial motion to dismiss remained pending.

What happened

M&K Imports, LLC sued Rejuveneda Medical Group, Inc., doing business as ReGenevada, along with Thom E. Lobe, Patrick D. Crocker, and Crocker Law Firm PLLC, also known as Crocker & Crocker. The opinion does not describe the claims.

Rejuveneda Medical Group and Thom E. Lobe filed a partial motion to dismiss. The court ordered M&K Imports to notify the court by July 1, 2022, whether it would file an amended complaint or rely on its existing complaint.

The order did not decide the motion to dismiss. If M&K Imports amended its complaint, it had 14 days after notifying the court to do so, and defendants then had 21 days to respond. Judge Vincent L. Briccetti also stated that the existing motion would proceed under the regular briefing rules if M&K Imports did not amend its complaint.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
M&K Imports, LLC v. Rejuveneda Medical Group, Inc. · No. 7:22-cv-02606
Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Date
June 23, 2022

Background

M&K Imports, LLC brought this action against Rejuveneda Medical Group, Inc., doing business as ReGenevada; Thom E. Lobe; Patrick D. Crocker; and Crocker Law Firm PLLC, also known as Crocker & Crocker. On June 22, 2022, Rejuveneda Medical Group and Lobe filed a partial motion to dismiss. The opinion does not state the claims addressed by that motion.

Order

The court ordered M&K Imports to notify the court by July 1, 2022, whether it intended to file an amended complaint in response to the partial motion to dismiss or would rely on the complaint already under review.

If M&K Imports chose not to amend, the motion would proceed under the regular briefing schedule, governed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Southern District of New York's Local Civil Rules unless the court ordered otherwise. The court stated that it was unlikely to give M&K Imports another opportunity to amend to address deficiencies made apparent by the fully briefed motion.

If M&K Imports chose to amend, it had to file the amended complaint within 14 days after notifying the court. Within 21 days after the amendment, defendants could answer, file a motion to dismiss the amended complaint, or, for Rejuvenada Medical Group and Lobe, notify the court that they would rely on the initially filed motion to dismiss.

Disposition and Significance

The court did not grant or deny the partial motion to dismiss. It issued case-management instructions concerning amendment of the complaint and the parties' next filings. The order was signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.