Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 28, 2022

Chen v. Vasan

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:22-cv-02938
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Chen v. Vasan, Judge Swain barred Victor Chen from future civil actions without permission when seeking to proceed without paying filing fees.

Who this affects

Victor Chen is barred from filing future civil actions in the Southern District of New York without paying filing fees unless he first obtains court permission. Any request for permission must include the proposed complaint and this bar order.

What happened

In Chen v. Vasan, Victor Chen, who was representing himself, had filed an action that the court dismissed as frivolous. The court noted that five of his other cases had also been dismissed as frivolous and ordered him to explain why he should not be restricted from filing future cases without paying filing fees.

Chen responded that he needed to proceed without paying fees because he lived on a fixed income and did not earn income from his writings. He also attached excerpts from two publications. The court found that his response did not address his history of filing frivolous actions.

Judge Swain issued the bar order. Chen must obtain the court’s permission before filing a future civil action without paying filing fees, and any request must include the proposed complaint and the bar order. The court also denied fee-free status for an appeal because it certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Chen v. Vasan · No. 1:22-cv-02938
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
June 28, 2022

Background

Victor Chen filed this action representing himself. On April 29, 2022, the court dismissed the action as frivolous. The court also noted that Chen had filed five other cases that were dismissed as frivolous. It ordered him to show cause, by declaration, why he should not be barred from filing additional civil actions in this court without paying filing fees unless he first obtained permission.

The court later extended Chen’s deadline. Chen filed a declaration on May 31, 2022. He argued that he needed to file without paying fees because he was on a fixed income, did not receive income from his writings, and might be prevented by law from selling his works. He also attached excerpts from two publications.

Reasoning

The court found that Chen’s arguments did not address the principal concern identified in the order to show cause: his history of filing frivolous actions. The court also found that the attached publication excerpts did not appear to respond to the order to show cause.

Ruling

The court issued the bar order under 28 U.S.C. § 1651. It barred Chen from filing future civil actions in this court without paying filing fees unless he first obtained leave from the court. Any motion for permission must include a copy of the proposed complaint and a copy of the bar order, and it must be filed with the court’s Pro Se Intake Unit. If Chen files an action without first seeking permission, the action will be dismissed for failure to comply with the order.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied Chen permission to proceed without paying fees for an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.