Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 21, 2022

Partridge v. Masley

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:22-cv-03206
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Partridge v. Masley, Judge Swain granted Partridge 14 more days to appeal but denied fee-free appeal status.

Who this affects

Nicholas D. Partridge was given 14 days to file a notice of appeal, but he was denied fee-free status for an appeal from this order. The order did not alter the prior dismissal of his complaint.

What happened

In Partridge v. Masley, Nicholas D. Partridge asked for more time to file a notice of appeal after the court dismissed his complaint against Judge Andrea Masley.

The court found that Partridge filed his request within the allowed period and showed good cause by stating that he did not have money at that time. It granted the request and ordered him to file a notice of appeal within 14 days. The court also stated that no further extension would be granted.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain denied fee-free status for an appeal from this order, certifying that such an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Partridge v. Masley · No. 1:22-cv-03206
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
July 21, 2022

Background

The court had previously dismissed Nicholas D. Partridge’s complaint under judicial immunity, as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), and as barred by the Anti-Injunction Act. Two days before the deadline to appeal expired, Partridge asked for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal. His motion stated that he did not have money at that time.

Applicable Rule

In a civil case, a notice of appeal generally must be filed within 30 days after judgment. Under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5), a district court may extend that deadline when the request is filed within 30 days after the deadline and the party shows good cause or excusable neglect. The court found that Partridge’s motion was timely and therefore had authority to decide it.

Ruling

For good cause shown, the court granted Partridge’s request for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal. It ordered him to file the notice within 14 days of the order and stated that no further extension would be granted.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied fee-free status for the purpose of an appeal. A footnote stated that, if Partridge could not pay the filing fees within the 14-day period, he could ask the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for permission to proceed without paying those fees.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.