Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 22, 2022

Budrow v. McCarey Landscaping, Inc.

Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Docket
7:22-cv-01773
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
FlsaEmploymentCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Budrow v. McCarey Landscaping, Inc., Judge Briccetti approved the parties’ wage-case settlement and closed the case.

Who this affects

John T. Budrow and the defendants—McCarey Landscaping, Inc., Donna McCarey, Timothy McCarey, and the identified John Does—are directly affected by the approved settlement and case closure.

What happened

In Budrow v. McCarey Landscaping, Inc., John T. Budrow filed a proposed settlement in his federal wage-law case against McCarey Landscaping, Inc., Donna McCarey, Timothy McCarey, and others. The opinion does not describe a decision on the underlying claims.

The court reviewed the agreement and found that the $63,030 payment to Budrow, excluding attorneys’ fees, exceeded the amount he sought for unpaid travel and lunch time with related benefits. The court also considered the risks and costs of continuing the case, Budrow’s representation by counsel, mediation by a neutral mediator, his departure from the defendants’ employment, the absence of a nondisparagement clause, and the limited scope of the release. It found the attorneys’ fees—about 31% of Budrow’s net recovery—fair and reasonable.

Judge Vincent L. Briccetti approved the settlement agreement, instructed the Clerk to close the case, and terminated the pending motion.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Budrow v. McCarey Landscaping, Inc. · No. 7:22-cv-01773
Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Date
July 22, 2022

Background

John T. Budrow brought this Fair Labor Standards Act case, a federal wage-and-hour lawsuit, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated against McCarey Landscaping, Inc., Donna McCarey, Timothy McCarey, and John Does identified as the top 10 shareholders of McCarey Landscaping, Inc. The opinion addresses the parties’ proposed settlement agreement and the statement explaining its basis.

Court’s Review

The court reviewed the settlement under the factors required by Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc. It noted that the $63,030 settlement amount to be paid to Budrow, excluding attorneys’ fees, exceeded the amount he sought for unpaid travel and lunch time and related fringe benefits, which his counsel described as the main focus of the lawsuit. The court also considered the risks and costs of continued litigation, Budrow’s representation by counsel, the assistance of a neutral mediator, the fact that Budrow no longer worked for the defendants, the absence of a nondisparagement clause, and the release’s limitation to claims arising from his employment or separation from employment that accrued before the agreement was signed.

The court found that the settlement was fair and reasonable and resulted from arm’s-length negotiations rather than fraud or collusion. It also found the attorneys’ fees, approximately 31% of Budrow’s net recovery, fair and reasonable under the circumstances.

Disposition

The court approved the parties’ settlement agreement. The Clerk was instructed to close the case and terminate the pending motion identified as Doc. #11. The opinion does not resolve the underlying wage claims on their merits.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.