Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 25, 2022

Allevato v. Mallozzi

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:22-cv-01768
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Allevato v. Howard, Judge Swain dismissed the complaint after Michael F. Allevato failed to file the required amended complaint.

Who this affects

Michael F. Allevato's complaint was dismissed, and fee-waiver status was denied for purposes of an appeal.

What happened

In Allevato v. Howard, the court had ordered Michael F. Allevato to file an amended complaint within 60 days and warned that failing to do so would result in dismissal.

Allevato did not file an amended complaint. The court dismissed the complaint under the federal statute governing complaints filed without paying the filing fee, denied fee-free status for any appeal, and directed the clerk to enter judgment.

Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain issued the order on July 25, 2022. The opinion does not discuss the claims’ merits.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Allevato v. Mallozzi · No. 1:22-cv-01768
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
July 25, 2022

Background

By an order dated May 16, 2022, the court directed Michael F. Allevato to file an amended complaint within 60 days. That order stated that the complaint would be dismissed if he did not comply. The opinion does not describe the claims in the complaint.

Ruling

Allevato did not file an amended complaint. The court therefore dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). The complaint had been filed without prepaying the filing fee under the court’s fee-waiver procedures.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. It consequently denied fee-waiver status for purposes of an appeal. The clerk was directed to enter judgment in the case.

Classification

This is a procedural order because the court dismissed the complaint based on the failure to file the required amended complaint and did not decide the underlying claims. The order does not state whether the dismissal was with or without prejudice.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.