Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 3, 2022

Mercer v. New York City Housing Authority

Judge
Lewis Liman
Docket
1:22-cv-02271
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Mercer v. New York City Housing Authority, Judge Liman ordered U.S. Marshals to serve the defendant while making no decision on the claims.

Who this affects

Robert Mercer and the New York City Housing Authority; the order also directs the Clerk of Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to handle service.

What happened

In Mercer v. New York City Housing Authority, Robert Mercer, representing himself, sued the New York City Housing Authority, alleging that it violated his rights. The opinion does not identify the specific rights or legal claims.

Because Mercer was allowed to proceed without paying court fees, the court said the U.S. Marshals Service would handle service of the summons and complaint. The court extended the service deadline to 90 days after the summons is issued.

Judge Lewis J. Liman directed the Clerk of Court to issue the summons, complete the service forms, send the required documents to the Marshals Service, and mail Mercer an information package. The order did not decide the merits of Mercer’s claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Mercer v. New York City Housing Authority · No. 1:22-cv-02271
Judge
Lewis Liman
Date
Aug. 3, 2022

Background

Robert Mercer, who is proceeding without a lawyer, brought an action against the New York City Housing Authority under the court’s federal-question jurisdiction. He alleges that the Housing Authority violated his rights, but this order does not specify the rights or legal theories involved. On March 30, 2022, the court allowed Mercer to proceed without prepaying court fees.

Service of process

Because Mercer was allowed to proceed without prepaying fees, the court explained that he could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the summons and complaint. The court extended the usual 90-day service period. Mercer’s deadline to complete service is 90 days after the summons is issued. The court stated that, if service is not completed within that period, Mercer should request more time.

Order

The court directed the Clerk of Court to issue a summons, complete the U.S. Marshals Service service forms with the Housing Authority’s service address, and provide the Marshals Service with the documents needed to serve the defendant. The Clerk was also directed to mail Mercer an information package. Mercer must notify the court in writing if his address changes, and the court stated that the action may be dismissed if he does not do so. Judge Lewis J. Liman’s order addressed service and case administration; it did not decide whether the Housing Authority violated Mercer’s rights.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.