Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 18, 2022

Genao v. The City of New York

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:22-cv-05676
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Genao v. The City of New York, Judge Swain dismissed Antonio Genao’s complaint without prejudice after he failed to meet filing requirements.

Who this affects

Antonio Genao’s complaint against the City of New York was dismissed without prejudice; the court also denied him permission to proceed without paying filing fees for an appeal.

What happened

Genao v. The City of New York involved Antonio Genao’s complaint against the City of New York. The court had ordered Genao to resubmit the complaint’s signature page and either pay the required $402 filing fee or request permission to proceed without paying it.

The court’s order was returned as undeliverable to the address Genao provided. He did not complete the required steps or notify the court of a new mailing address, even though the earlier order warned that failing to comply would lead to dismissal.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain dismissed the complaint without prejudice, meaning the dismissal did not bar refiling. She also denied permission to proceed without paying fees for an appeal and directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Genao v. The City of New York · No. 1:22-cv-05676
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Aug. 18, 2022

Background

Antonio Genao brought a complaint against the City of New York. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims.

Court’s Earlier Order

On July 12, 2022, the court directed Genao, within 30 days, to resubmit the complaint’s signature page and either pay the $402 filing fee required for a civil action or submit a completed request to proceed without paying the fee. The court warned that failure to comply would result in dismissal.

The earlier order was returned as undeliverable on August 5, 2022, to the mailing address Genao had provided. Genao did not comply with the order and did not notify the court that his mailing address had changed.

Ruling

The court dismissed Genao’s complaint without prejudice because he failed to comply with the court’s order. The court also certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without paying filing fees for an appeal. The Clerk of Court was directed to issue judgment.

Classification Basis

This is a procedural order. The court dismissed the complaint for failure to complete filing requirements and did not address the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.