Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 24, 2022

Brown v. The Gente that have an unusual advantage of Tele

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:22-cv-07137
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

Brown v. the “Gente,” Judge Swain ordered the plaintiffs to pay fees or submit proper applications and signatures within 30 days.

Who this affects

Yariel D. Brown, Coco III, and Zaza were required to pay the filing fees or submit proper applications within 30 days; Coco III and Zaza also had to submit original complaint signatures. A plaintiff who failed to comply would have that plaintiff’s claims dismissed.

What happened

In Brown v. the “Gente” That Have an Unusual Advantage of Tele, Yariel D. Brown, Coco III, and Zaza filed a civil action without paying the required fees. The plaintiffs were representing themselves. Brown submitted a blank application to proceed without prepaying fees, while Coco III and Zaza submitted no such applications.

The court ordered the plaintiffs, within 30 days, either to pay $402 or for each plaintiff to complete, sign, and submit an application showing an inability to pay. Coco III and Zaza also had to submit an original signature page for the complaint. The court directed that no summons issue at that time.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain warned that the claims of any plaintiff who failed to comply would be dismissed. She also ruled that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Brown v. The Gente that have an unusual advantage of Tele · No. 1:22-cv-07137
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Aug. 24, 2022

Background

The plaintiffs brought the action without lawyers and did not pay the filing fees. The court explained that starting a civil action required payment of $402: a $350 filing fee and a $52 administrative fee. Alternatively, each plaintiff could request permission to proceed without paying fees in advance by submitting a signed application.

Yariel D. Brown was the only plaintiff who submitted an application, but it was blank and did not show an inability to pay. Coco III and Zaza did not submit applications. The court also determined that Coco III and Zaza had to provide original signatures because the complaint’s papers must be personally signed by an unrepresented party.

Order

The court gave the plaintiffs 30 days from the date of the order to either pay the $402 in fees or have each plaintiff complete, sign, and submit an application to proceed without prepaying fees. Any application had to identify docket number 22-CV-7137 (LTS) and include facts showing that the applicant could not pay. If the court granted the applications, the plaintiffs could proceed without prepaying fees.

The court separately directed Coco III and Zaza to resubmit the complaint’s signature page with original signatures within 30 days. No summons was to issue at that time. The court stated that, if the plaintiffs complied, the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures; if any plaintiff failed to comply within the allowed period, the court would dismiss that plaintiff’s claims.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The order directed payment of fees or applications and original signatures; it did not itself dismiss the action.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.