Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 2, 2022

Crestmark v. Cabrera Delandestoy

Judge
Lorna Schofield
Docket
1:22-cv-02253
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Crestmark v. Cabrera Delandestoy, Judge Schofield entered default judgment against AY-AY Telco for $6,164,777.47.

Who this affects

Crestmark received a judgment against AY-AY Telco Management Services, LLC for $6,164,777.47. The order directed the Clerk of Court to close the case. The text provided does not state that Cabrera Delandestoy was personally subjected to the judgment.

What happened

Crestmark sued AY-AY Telco Management Services, LLC and Eillien Lorena Cabrera Delandestoy. The complaint alleged fraud, conversion, civil conspiracy, and violations of New York’s Debtor and Creditor Law. AY-AY Telco was served through Cabrera Delandestoy, who accepted service for the company.

AY-AY Telco did not answer the complaint before the deadline. The court concluded that the complaint adequately alleged that AY-AY Telco withdrew Crestmark’s loan advances from a specified account and used them for its own purposes, contrary to the relevant agreements and loan documents.

The court entered judgment for Crestmark against AY-AY Telco in the liquidated amount of $6,164,777.47 and directed the Clerk of Court to close the case. Judge Lorna Schofield issued the order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Crestmark v. Cabrera Delandestoy · No. 1:22-cv-02253
Judge
Lorna Schofield
Date
Sept. 2, 2022

Background

Crestmark, a division of MetaBank, National Association, brought the action against Eillien Lorena Cabrera Delandestoy and AY-AY Telco Management Services, LLC. The complaint alleged fraud, conversion, civil conspiracy, and violations of New York’s Debtor and Creditor Law. It also alleged that AY-AY Telco withdrew Crestmark’s loan advances to Silver Birch from Teleescrow Account 175306471 and converted those advances for its own use, even though the withdrawals were not permitted by the agreements and loan documents identified in the complaint.

Service and failure to answer

The summons and complaint were personally served on AY-AY Telco’s registered agent, Cabrera Delandestoy, on March 25, 2022. Cabrera Delandestoy accepted service on behalf of AY-AY Telco. Proof of service was filed on July 14, 2022. AY-AY Telco did not answer the complaint, and the deadline for answering expired.

Ruling

The court entered default judgment against AY-AY Telco. A default judgment is a judgment entered after a defendant fails to respond to the lawsuit. The court stated that the complaint adequately pleaded claims establishing AY-AY Telco’s liability as a matter of law. The judgment awarded Crestmark $6,164,777.47, described as a liquidated amount. The Clerk of Court was directed to enter the judgment and close the case. The text provided does not state that a judgment was entered against Cabrera Delandestoy personally.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.