Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 7, 2022

Lewis v. Hudson Valley Justice Center

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:22-cv-07574
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Lewis v. Hudson Valley Justice Center, Judge Swain denied IFP leave and dismissed the action without prejudice as frivolous.

Who this affects

Regina Lewis was denied permission to proceed without prepaying the filing fee, and her action was dismissed without prejudice. The order also denied her permission to appeal without prepaying the appellate filing fee.

What happened

In Lewis v. Hudson Valley Justice Center, Regina Lewis filed a new case without a lawyer and asked to proceed without paying the filing fee. She alleged that the Hudson Valley Justice Center refused to represent her in a landlord-tenant matter and identified herself as Indigenous and disabled.

The court had previously required Lewis to obtain permission before filing new cases without paying filing fees because of her history of frivolous and non-meritorious litigation. Lewis asked for that permission, arguing that her disability-discrimination claims had not previously been decided on their merits by a federal court.

Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain denied Lewis permission to proceed without prepaying the filing fee, dismissed the action without prejudice, and entered judgment. The court also denied permission to appeal without paying the appellate filing fee, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Lewis v. Hudson Valley Justice Center · No. 1:22-cv-07574
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Sept. 7, 2022

Background

Regina Lewis filed this pro se action against the Hudson Valley Justice Center, Jason Mays, and the Deputy Director. She purported to invoke federal-question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Lewis alleged that “the defendant refused to represent me in a Land lord [sic] tenant matter” and stated that she is Indigenous and disabled. She sought permission to proceed without prepaying the filing fee and separately sought permission to file the action because, in her view, her disability-discrimination claims had not previously been raised and decided on their merits in federal court.

The opinion states that Lewis had previously been barred from filing new actions without prepaying filing fees unless she first obtained court permission, because of her continued filing of frivolous and non-meritorious actions. The opinion also refers to other filing restrictions imposed in prior related proceedings.

Ruling

The court denied Lewis permission to proceed without prepaying the filing fees because it found that this action did not represent a departure from her pattern of frivolous and non-meritorious litigation. The court therefore dismissed the action without prejudice under the order’s stated authority, 28 U.S.C. § 1651. “Without prejudice” means the dismissal did not bar refiling, although the opinion does not state what requirements would apply to any later filing.

Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied Lewis permission to appeal without prepaying the appellate filing fee. The Clerk of Court was directed to enter judgment.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.