Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 8, 2022

Williams v. Walker

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:22-cv-06550
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Williams v. Walker, Judge Swain dismissed Andrew Williams’s petition without prejudice after he neither sought a fee waiver nor paid the $5 filing fee.

Who this affects

Andrew Williams’s petition was dismissed without prejudice. Williams was also denied permission to appeal without paying the appeal fee; Warden S. Walker remains the named respondent.

What happened

Williams v. Walker involved Andrew Williams’s petition against Warden S. Walker. The court had ordered Williams to submit a completed request to proceed without paying the filing fee or to pay the $5 filing fee within 30 days.

Williams did neither. The opinion does not decide the substance of his petition; it addresses only his failure to comply with the filing requirement.

Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain dismissed the petition without prejudice, meaning it was not permanently barred from being filed again. She also denied Williams permission to appeal without paying the appeal fee and directed the clerk to enter judgment.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Williams v. Walker · No. 1:22-cv-06550
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Sept. 8, 2022

Background

Andrew Williams filed a petition against Warden S. Walker. The opinion does not identify the petition’s underlying legal claim.

On August 3, 2022, the court ordered Williams, within 30 days, either to submit a completed application to proceed without paying the filing fee or to pay the $5 filing fee. The order warned that failure to comply would result in dismissal. Williams did not submit the application or pay the fee.

Ruling

Chief United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain dismissed the petition without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914 and 1915. The court therefore did not reach the underlying substance of the petition. “Without prejudice” means the dismissal does not itself permanently bar a later filing.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying the appeal fee. The clerk was directed to enter judgment.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.