Zawadzki v. Dept. of Justice
- Laura Swain
- 1:22-cv-07701
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Kryst Zawadzki v. Dept. of Justice, Judge Swain dismissed the action without prejudice after finding Young Yil Jo filed it in Zawadzki’s name.
The action filed in Kryst Zawadzki’s name was dismissed, while Young Yil Jo remained subject to the court’s filing restrictions.
What happened
In Kryst Zawadzki v. Dept. of Justice, the court considered a lawsuit filed in Kryst Zawadzki’s name without a lawyer.
The court found that Young Yil Jo had filed the action. Jo had previously been barred from filing documents in another person’s name and from filing new cases in the court without permission.
Judge Laura Taylor Swain dismissed the action without prejudice to any case Zawadzki might bring in the future. The court also denied permission to appeal without paying the filing fees and directed that judgment be entered.
The detailed version
- Zawadzki v. Dept. of Justice · No. 1:22-cv-07701
- Laura Swain
- Sept. 9, 2022
Background
The court received this lawsuit on August 4, 2022. It was described as a case brought by Kryst Zawadzki without a lawyer. The court found that Young Yil Jo had filed the action in Zawadzki’s name. The opinion refers to prior related proceedings in which the court noted that Jo had filed multiple lawsuits in Zawadzki’s name.
The court also noted that Jo had previously been barred from filing any document in the court in another person’s name. Jo had separately been barred from filing any new civil action or proceeding in the court without first obtaining the court’s permission.
Ruling
The court dismissed this action without prejudice to any civil action that Kryst Zawadzki may wish to bring in the future. This means the dismissal did not bar Zawadzki from bringing a future civil action. The court did not decide the underlying legal issues in the action.
The court stated that the filing restrictions against Jo remained in effect. Jo remained barred from filing a new civil action or proceeding in the court without first obtaining permission, and from filing any court document in another person’s name. The court stated that it would continue to dismiss cases Jo filed in another person’s name without prejudice to that person’s possible future case, and warned that additional restrictions and sanctions could be imposed if Jo continued doing so.
Additional Orders
Judge Laura Taylor Swain certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying the filing fees. The Clerk of Court was directed to mail the order to the address for Kryst Zawadzki listed on the docket and to enter judgment.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.