Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 5, 2022

Ehsh Technology Inc v. Felberbaum

Judge
Vernon Broderick
Docket
1:22-cv-05927
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Preliminary InjunctionCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Ehsh Technology Inc. v. Felberbaum, Judge Broderick denied the temporary restraining order and preliminary-injunction motions and stayed case deadlines.

Who this affects

Ehsh Technology Inc., David Felberbaum, and Play Unique were affected. The court denied the plaintiff’s requests for interim injunctive relief, required counsel-related steps for the defendants, and stayed the case deadlines.

What happened

Ehsh Technology Inc. v. Felberbaum involved a telephone conference about the plaintiff’s request for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction. Plaintiff Ehsh Technology Inc. and defendant David Felberbaum appeared at the conference.

The court denied the temporary restraining order, referring to an earlier order, and denied the motion for a preliminary injunction. The opinion does not state the reasons for those denials.

Judge Broderick also ordered Felberbaum to retain a lawyer for corporate defendant Play Unique and decide whether to retain a lawyer personally or proceed without one. The court scheduled another telephone conference, stayed all case deadlines until after that conference, and ordered the plaintiff to email Felberbaum a copy of the order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Ehsh Technology Inc v. Felberbaum · No. 1:22-cv-05927
Judge
Vernon Broderick
Date
Oct. 5, 2022

Background

On September 30, 2022, Ehsh Technology Inc. and David Felberbaum appeared by telephone before the court regarding the plaintiff’s requests for a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction. The opinion does not describe the underlying dispute or the relief sought in those requests.

Rulings on Injunctive Relief

The court ordered that the plaintiff’s temporary restraining order was denied, as stated in the court’s September 12, 2022 order. The court also denied the plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction. The October 5 order does not provide the court’s reasoning for either denial.

Counsel and Case Management

The court ordered David Felberbaum to retain counsel for corporate defendant Play Unique by October 21, 2022. The court also ordered Felberbaum to determine whether he personally would retain counsel or proceed without a lawyer. The order notes that corporations must be represented by counsel in federal court.

The court scheduled a telephone conference for October 28, 2022, to discuss the defendants’ retention of counsel and set a briefing schedule. All deadlines in the case were stayed until after that conference. The court also ordered Ehsh Technology Inc. to email a copy of the order to Felberbaum.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.