Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 13, 2022

Celli v. Engelmayer

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:22-cv-06535
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Celli v. Engelmayer, Judge Swain dismissed the complaint without prejudice after required filing submissions were not made.

Who this affects

Lucio Celli's complaint was dismissed without prejudice; the court also denied permission to appeal without paying the appellate filing fee.

What happened

In Celli v. Engelmayer, the court had ordered Lucio Celli to either pay the $402 filing fee or submit a completed request to proceed without paying it and a prisoner authorization form.

Celli did neither within the required 30 days, so the court dismissed his complaint without prejudice. The opinion does not address the underlying claims.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain also ruled that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying the fee.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Celli v. Engelmayer · No. 1:22-cv-06535
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Oct. 13, 2022

Background

Lucio Celli filed a civil complaint against Judge Engelmayer and other defendants. The court had previously ordered Celli, within 30 days, to do one of two things: pay the $402 filing fee required for a civil action, or submit a completed application to proceed without paying the fee and a prisoner authorization form.

The court's earlier order warned that failure to comply would result in dismissal. Celli did not pay the filing fee and did not submit the required application and authorization.

Ruling

The court dismissed the complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914 and 1915. Because the dismissal was based on failure to satisfy the filing requirements, the opinion did not decide the merits of Celli's claims.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied permission to appeal without paying the required fee.

The opinion's footnote states that Celli's address of record was in Wappingers Falls, New York, while a Federal Bureau of Prisons inmate locator indicated that he was in custody at FMC Lexington in Kentucky. A copy of the earlier order mailed to FMC Lexington was returned as undeliverable, although the locator continued to indicate that Celli was incarcerated there. The clerk was directed to enter judgment.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.