Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 21, 2022

Felton v. Mid-Bronx Senior Citizens Council Inc.

Judge
Paul Gardephe
Docket
1:22-cv-03519
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

Felton v. Mid-Bronx Senior Citizens Council, Judge Gardephe granted the parties’ request to extend their settlement-filing deadline to November 15, 2022.

Who this affects

All parties to the case, whose deadline to submit the settlement agreement and approval application was extended to November 15, 2022.

What happened

In Felton v. Mid-Bronx Senior Citizens Council Inc., the parties asked for more time to submit a written settlement agreement and a request for court approval. They said they had drafted the settlement language but had not yet obtained all necessary signatures.

The parties requested a seven-day extension from the existing October 20 deadline, which would have moved the deadline to October 27. The court instead extended the deadline to November 15, 2022.

Judge Gardephe granted the extension and directed the parties to file the application earlier if possible. The order did not decide the underlying dispute.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Felton v. Mid-Bronx Senior Citizens Council Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-03519
Judge
Paul Gardephe
Date
Oct. 21, 2022

Background

The parties jointly requested additional time to submit a settlement agreement and a motion asking the court to approve it. Counsel stated that the parties had drafted the settlement language and were obtaining the required signatures, but had not secured all signatures by the existing deadline. The request was described as the defendants’ first request for an extension, and the parties stated that no future deadlines would be affected.

Ruling

The court granted an extension through November 15, 2022. The court also instructed the parties to file the application earlier if possible and stated that the application should be addressed to Judge Gardephe unless the parties consented to the undersigned judge. The order addressed only the settlement-filing deadline and did not resolve the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.