Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 24, 2022

Yan Luis v. Goldthread LLC

Judge
Valerie Caproni
Docket
1:22-cv-04892
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
ADA / DisabilityCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Kevin Yan Luis v. Goldthread LLC, Judge Caproni dismissed the case without prejudice because the complaint did not adequately allege standing.

Who this affects

The dismissal ended Kevin Yan Luis’s case against Goldthread, LLC, without prejudice. The court also canceled the case’s scheduled conferences and deadlines, terminated open motions, and closed the case.

What happened

In Kevin Yan Luis v. Goldthread LLC, Kevin Yan Luis alleged that Goldthread’s website was inaccessible to visually impaired people, violating federal, state, and city disability-rights laws.

The court found that the complaint’s allegations were at least as conclusory as allegations the Second Circuit had rejected for failing to establish standing. The court gave Luis a choice: explain why the case should not be dismissed or seek permission to amend the complaint.

Luis’s first amendment request did not follow the court’s filing requirements, and he did not file a corrected request by the deadline. Judge Valerie Caproni dismissed the case without prejudice for failure to allege standing, canceled the scheduled conferences and deadlines, terminated the open motions, and closed the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Yan Luis v. Goldthread LLC · No. 1:22-cv-04892
Judge
Valerie Caproni
Date
Oct. 24, 2022

Background

Kevin Yan Luis sued Goldthread, LLC, alleging that Goldthread’s failure to make its website accessible to visually impaired people violated the Americans with Disabilities Act, the New York State Human Rights Law, and the New York City Human Rights Law. The opinion states that the lawsuit was filed on June 10, 2022, and that Luis brought it on behalf of himself and others similarly situated.

Court’s Concern About Standing

On October 11, 2022, the court ordered Luis either to show why the case should not be dismissed for lack of standing or to seek permission to file an amended complaint. Standing is the legal requirement that a plaintiff show a sufficient personal connection to the alleged injury to bring the case. The court said the complaint’s allegations were at least as conclusory as allegations that the Second Circuit had dismissed for failure to establish standing in a cited decision.

Amendment Request and Ruling

Luis filed a one-paragraph letter requesting permission to amend the complaint, but he did not attach the redlined proposed amended complaint required by the judge’s individual practices. The court dismissed that motion without prejudice and ordered Luis to refile it by noon on October 24, 2022. Luis did not file a renewed motion by the deadline.

The court dismissed the case without prejudice for failure to allege standing. It also canceled all previously scheduled conferences and other deadlines, directed the Clerk to terminate all open motions, and closed the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.