Franco v. American Airlines, Inc.
- Willis
- 1:21-cv-05918
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 3
In Franco v. American Airlines, Judge Willis granted counsel’s withdrawal motion and set deadlines for new counsel and limited discovery.
Justin Franco’s lawyers were permitted to withdraw. Franco had to obtain new counsel or appear without a lawyer by November 15, 2022, and both parties received a limited discovery extension.
What happened
In Franco v. American Airlines, Inc., Plaintiff Justin Franco sued his former employer under federal and New York discrimination laws, alleging discrimination, retaliation, and harassment. The case was near the end of discovery, which had already been extended three times.
Franco’s lawyers, Susan Kaplan and Robert Rambadadt, asked to withdraw, stating that communication with Franco had deteriorated and that his exchanges and actions made it unreasonably difficult to represent him. American Airlines opposed the motion only to the extent it would extend discovery for work Franco had not completed.
Judge Jennifer E. Willis granted the withdrawal motion. She extended discovery to December 15, 2022 for specified depositions, required Franco to obtain new counsel or appear without a lawyer by November 15, 2022, and allowed Franco to complete two depositions during the extended period.
The detailed version
- Franco v. American Airlines, Inc. · No. 1:21-cv-05918
- Willis
- Oct. 26, 2022
Background
The case was removed from New York state court on July 9, 2021. On September 3, 2021, Justin Franco, identified as American Airlines’ former employee, filed claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the New York State Human Rights Law, and the New York City Human Rights Law. He alleged that American Airlines failed to provide a workplace free from discrimination, retaliation, and harassment.
Discovery had largely been completed. The court had extended discovery for a third time to October 21, 2022, for specified depositions and document production. The court then stayed discovery while deciding whether Franco’s counsel could withdraw.
Motion to Withdraw
Susan Kaplan and Robert Rambadadt moved to withdraw as Franco’s counsel. Under Southern District of New York Local Civil Rule 1.4, counsel may withdraw only with the court’s permission and must show satisfactory reasons, considering the posture of the case. The opinion states that satisfactory reasons can include failure to pay legal fees, lack of client cooperation or communication, and an irreconcilable attorney-client conflict. The court may also consider whether the motion is opposed and whether withdrawal would disrupt the case.
Counsel stated in a sworn declaration that their communications with Franco had deteriorated from non-communication to no communication and that Franco’s exchanges and actions had made it unreasonably difficult for them to represent him effectively. The court found that declaration sufficient to support withdrawal. It also noted that the case was at the end of discovery, was not close to trial, and had no pending motions other than the withdrawal motion.
Ruling and Case Schedule
The court granted the motion to withdraw. It extended discovery until December 15, 2022, so American Airlines could depose Dr. Haber and Mr. Soogrim. Because counsel had difficulty scheduling depositions before filing the withdrawal motion, Franco could also depose Ms. Coplin and Ms. Thomas during the extended discovery period.
American Airlines could ask to reopen discovery concerning testimony from its depositions of Dr. Haber and Mr. Soogrim after Franco obtained new counsel or filed an appearance without a lawyer. Franco was required to obtain new counsel or file an appearance without a lawyer by November 15, 2022. The court also set January 9, 2023, as the deadline for letters seeking permission to file post-discovery dispositive motions, with opposition letters due January 12, 2023. Judge Jennifer E. Willis directed the clerk to close docket numbers 49 and 50.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.