Carter v. United States of America
- Laura Swain
- 1:22-cv-09139
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Carter v. United States, Judge Swain transferred the Federal Tort Claims Act case to the Eastern District of New York because venue was improper here.
Shaquille Carter's FTCA action was transferred from the Southern District of New York to the Eastern District of New York; the receiving court will decide whether he may proceed without prepaying fees.
What happened
Carter v. United States of America is a case brought by Shaquille Carter without a lawyer under the Federal Tort Claims Act. He alleged that events supporting his claims occurred while he was incarcerated at the federal Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, New York.
The court concluded that the case belonged in the Eastern District of New York because Kings County, where the alleged events occurred, is in that district. The court therefore transferred the action there rather than dismissing it.
Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered the clerk to transfer the case and closed it in the Southern District of New York. She also stated that the receiving court would decide whether Carter could continue without paying filing fees, and denied permission to appeal without paying fees because an appeal would not be taken in good faith.
The detailed version
- Carter v. United States of America · No. 1:22-cv-09139
- Laura Swain
- Oct. 27, 2022
Background
Shaquille Carter, who was incarcerated at the Federal Correctional Institution in Danbury, Connecticut, brought this action without a lawyer under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA). He asserted claims arising from events allegedly occurring at the federal Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, New York, while he was incarcerated there. The defendants included the United States of America and other defendants listed in the caption.
Venue analysis
The court applied 28 U.S.C. § 1402(b), which provides that an FTCA action must be brought either in the judicial district where the plaintiff resides or in the district where the complained-of act or omission occurred. The court stated that Carter alleged that the events underlying his claims occurred at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, in Kings County. Kings County is within the Eastern District of New York. The court concluded that Carter had not shown facts establishing that the Southern District of New York was a proper venue, while the Eastern District of New York was a proper venue.
Ruling
Under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), when a case is filed in the wrong venue, a court may dismiss it or, in the interest of justice, transfer it to a district where it could have been brought. The court transferred the action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York in the interest of justice. The order directs the clerk to make the transfer, states that no summons would issue from the Southern District of New York, and closes the action in that court.
The order leaves to the Eastern District of New York the question whether Carter may proceed without prepaying filing fees. The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.