Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 28, 2022

Brown v. Blinken

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:22-cv-09205
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Brown v. Blinken, Judge Swain ordered Kenneth Anderson Brown to pay fees or submit an IFP application within 30 days.

Who this affects

Kenneth Anderson Brown, who was ordered to pay the filing fees or submit an application to proceed without prepaying them.

What happened

In Brown v. Blinken, Kenneth Anderson Brown filed a civil complaint without paying the required fees or submitting an application to proceed without paying them upfront.

The court ordered Brown to pay $402 or submit a signed application within 30 days. The court said no summons would issue yet and warned that the action would be dismissed if he did not comply.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain also determined that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The order did not decide the claims’ merits.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Brown v. Blinken · No. 1:22-cv-09205
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Oct. 28, 2022

Background

Kenneth Anderson Brown filed this civil action without paying the required filing fees and without submitting an application to proceed without prepaying fees. The opinion states that Brown was representing himself.

Order

The court explained that filing a civil action required either payment of $402—consisting of a $350 filing fee and a $52 administrative fee—or a signed application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), meaning without prepaying the fees. The court ordered Brown, within 30 days of the order, to pay the fees or submit the attached IFP application.

The court stated that no summons would issue at that time. If Brown complied, the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures. If he failed to comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed.

Appeal-related ruling

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied IFP status for purposes of an appeal. Judge Laura Taylor Swain did not address the merits of Brown’s claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.