Barsch v. Onda Beauty, Inc.
- Ronnie Abrams
- 1:22-cv-03492
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Barsch v. Onda Beauty, Judge Abrams discontinued the settled case without costs, allowing restoration within 30 days.
Marie Barsch and Onda Beauty, Inc.; the action was closed after the court was informed that it had settled.
What happened
Barsch v. Onda Beauty, Inc. was reported to the court as settled. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement terms.
The court discontinued the action without costs to either party and without prejudice to restoring it if an application was made within 30 days. The clerk was directed to close the case.
Judge Ronnie Abrams also stated that any request to reopen filed after 30 days could be denied on that basis, and that any request for the court to retain authority to enforce the settlement had to place the agreement on the public record and obtain the court’s approval within 30 days.
The detailed version
- Barsch v. Onda Beauty, Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-03492
- Ronnie Abrams
- Nov. 21, 2022
Background
The court was informed that the case had been settled. The opinion does not identify the claims, describe the settlement, or state whether the parties asked the court to keep authority to enforce the settlement.
Order
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s docket if an application to restore it was made within 30 days. It also stated that any application to reopen filed after that period could be denied solely because it was late.
The court further stated that, if the parties wanted it to retain authority to enforce the settlement agreement, the agreement’s terms had to be placed on the public record and approved by the court within the same 30-day period. The clerk was directed to close the case.
Disposition
This was a procedural order closing a settled case; the court did not decide the underlying legal claims. The order was entered by Judge Ronnie Abrams on November 21, 2022.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.