Rompalli v. 63 West LLC
- Laura Swain
- 1:22-cv-09617
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Rompalli v. 63 West LLC, Judge Swain ordered Rompalli to pay fees or submit an amended IFP application within 30 days.
Murty Rompalli, who brought the action without a lawyer, and defendants 63 West LLC and Real New York LLC.
What happened
Murty Rompalli brought this case without a lawyer against 63 West LLC and Real New York LLC. He submitted an application asking to proceed without paying court fees upfront.
The court found that Rompalli’s application did not clearly show that he could not pay the required $402. The application listed employment income, money in an account, expenses, and a debt to New York State, but left some financial information unclear.
Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered Rompalli to pay the $402 or submit a completed and signed amended application within 30 days. The court said no summons would issue yet and that the case would be dismissed if he did not comply; it also denied fee-waiver status for any appeal from the order.
The detailed version
- Rompalli v. 63 West LLC · No. 1:22-cv-09617
- Laura Swain
- Nov. 18, 2022
Background
Murty Rompalli brought this civil action without a lawyer against 63 West LLC and Real New York LLC. To begin a civil action in the court, a plaintiff must either pay $402 in fees or submit a completed and signed application to proceed without paying fees upfront, commonly called an IFP application.
Rompalli submitted an IFP application. The court said the application did not establish that he was unable to pay. He stated that he was employed and earned $7,000 per month, had $25,000 in an account, had monthly expenses of $2,500, and owed New York State $50,000. The court also identified unanswered or unclear questions about other possible sources of funds and financial obligations involving dependents.
Order
The court ordered Rompalli, within 30 days of the order, either to pay the $402 in fees or to complete, sign, and submit an amended IFP application. The amended application had to address the financial deficiencies identified by the court. If the court granted the amended application, Rompalli would be allowed to proceed without paying the fees upfront.
No summons would issue at that time. The court stated that, if Rompalli complied, the action would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures. If he failed to comply within the permitted time, the action would be dismissed. The court also certified that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied IFP status for purposes of an appeal.
Disposition
Judge Laura Taylor Swain did not decide the underlying claims against the defendants. She issued an order directing payment of fees or submission of an amended IFP application.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.