Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 2, 2022

Francis v. West Broadway Glass Company, LLC

Judge
Valerie Caproni
Docket
1:22-cv-02218
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Francis v. West Broadway Glass, Judge Caproni dismissed the settled case with prejudice and without costs.

Who this affects

Ashley Francis, West Broadway Glass Company, LLC, and Flipper's NYC LLC. The case was dismissed with prejudice without costs or attorneys’ fees to either party; the parties may seek reopening or court enforcement of their settlement under the conditions stated in the order.

What happened

In Francis v. West Broadway Glass Company, LLC, Ashley Francis and the defendants reached an agreement in principle resolving all issues.

The court canceled scheduled conferences and deadlines, dismissed the case with prejudice, and ordered that neither party would pay costs or attorneys’ fees. The clerk was directed to close the case and terminate pending motions.

Judge Valerie Caproni allowed the parties to seek reopening within 30 days for good cause and explained how they could ask the court to retain authority to enforce their settlement agreement.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Francis v. West Broadway Glass Company, LLC · No. 1:22-cv-02218
Judge
Valerie Caproni
Date
Dec. 2, 2022

Background

The court stated that its mediation department had reported on November 28, 2022, that the parties had reached an agreement in principle resolving all issues. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement’s terms.

Court’s action

The court canceled all previously scheduled conferences and other deadlines. It dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, including attorneys’ fees, to either party. The clerk was directed to terminate all open motions and close the case.

Possible reopening and settlement enforcement

The parties may apply to reopen the case within 30 days of the order. Such an application must show good cause for keeping the case open despite the settlement. The order states that a request filed after 30 days or without a showing of good cause may be denied solely on that basis.

If the parties want the court to retain jurisdiction—legal authority—to enforce their settlement agreement, they must, within the same 30-day period, submit the agreement under Rule 7.A of the court’s Individual Practices and request an order expressly retaining that authority.

Disposition

Judge Valerie Caproni dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs and directed that it be closed. The order did not decide the merits of the underlying dispute.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.