Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 2, 2022

Scales v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:22-cv-09683
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Scales v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, Judge Swain transferred William Scales’s case to the Eastern District of New York because venue was improper.

Who this affects

William Scales, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and Applie Inc.; the case was transferred from the Southern District of New York to the Eastern District of New York.

What happened

Scales v. Federal Bureau of Investigation concerns William Scales’s pro se claims that the Federal Bureau of Investigation illegally observed his mobile devices and living spaces, including at an Apple store in Brooklyn. He sued the FBI and Applie Inc.

The court concluded that the Southern District of New York was not the proper venue because the alleged events occurred in Brooklyn and the defendants did not reside there. Brooklyn is in the Eastern District of New York, so the court transferred the action there rather than deciding the claims.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered the transfer under the federal venue statute and closed the Southern District case. She left any decision about whether Scales could proceed without paying filing fees to the transferee court, and no summons would issue from the Southern District.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Scales v. Federal Bureau of Investigation · No. 1:22-cv-09683
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Dec. 2, 2022

Background

William Scales, proceeding without a lawyer, brought federal-question and state-law claims against the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Applie Inc. He alleged that the FBI had illegally observed his mobile devices and living spaces for seven years, including at an Apple store in Williamsburg, Brooklyn. The opinion states that Scales resides in Brooklyn, that the FBI provided a Washington, D.C., address, and that the complaint identified a Brooklyn address for the Apple store.

Venue analysis

Federal law generally permits a civil action to be filed where a defendant resides, where a substantial part of the events occurred, or, in limited circumstances, where a defendant is subject to the court’s personal jurisdiction. The court found that venue was not proper in the Southern District of New York because the defendants did not reside there and the alleged events occurred in Brooklyn. Under the federal transfer statute, a court may transfer a case filed in the wrong venue when doing so serves the interests of justice. Because Brooklyn is in the Eastern District of New York, the court determined that the Eastern District was the proper venue.

Ruling

Judge Laura Taylor Swain directed the Clerk to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The order closed the Southern District case, stated that no summons would issue from that court, and left the decision about whether Scales could proceed without prepaying fees to the transferee court. The court also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for purposes of an appeal. The court did not decide whether Scales’s allegations were legally valid.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.