Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 5, 2022

Tineo-Santos v. Dudelson

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:22-cv-10170
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
5
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Tineo-Santos v. Dudelson, Judge Swain ordered Francisco Tineo-Santos to pay fees or submit required forms within 30 days.

Who this affects

Francisco Tineo-Santos, an incarcerated plaintiff proceeding without a lawyer, must either pay the required fees or submit the required application and prisoner authorization for the action to proceed.

What happened

In Tineo-Santos v. Dudelson, Francisco Tineo-Santos filed a civil lawsuit while incarcerated and without paying the required fees or submitting the required forms to proceed without prepaying them. The opinion does not describe the lawsuit’s underlying claims.

The court ordered Tineo-Santos to either pay $402 in fees or submit a signed application to proceed without prepaying fees and a prisoner authorization within 30 days. The court said no answer was required yet and warned that the action would be dismissed if he did not comply.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain also denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith. The order addressed filing requirements, not the merits of the lawsuit.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Tineo-Santos v. Dudelson · No. 1:22-cv-10170
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Dec. 5, 2022

Background

Francisco Tineo-Santos, who was incarcerated at Wende Correctional Facility, filed this civil action without a lawyer. He submitted the complaint without paying the filing fees and without submitting a completed application to proceed without prepaying fees or a prisoner authorization.

Court’s Order

The court explained that a prisoner starting a civil action must either pay $402 in fees—a $350 filing fee and a $52 administrative fee—or submit the required application and authorization to request permission to proceed without prepaying fees. Even if permission is granted, the $350 filing fee must be collected from a prisoner’s account in installments. The prisoner authorization allows the facility to deduct those payments and requires certified account statements for the previous six months to be sent to the court.

Within 30 days of the order, Tineo-Santos had to either pay the $402 or submit the completed application and prisoner authorization, labeled with docket number 22-CV-10170. The court stated that no answer was required at that time. If Tineo-Santos complied, the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office’s procedures; if he failed to comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed.

Appeal and Classification

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The order also warned that certain future dismissals of prisoner actions could count as strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The opinion does not address the merits of Tineo-Santos’s claims against Alexander Martin Dudelson. Judge Laura Taylor Swain’s order was therefore a procedural order concerning filing fees and required forms.

The authoritative version

Read the full 5-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.