Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 7, 2022

Nguyen v. N/A-Crime

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:22-cv-10240
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Nguyen v. N/A-Crime, Judge Swain ordered payment of fees or a completed application to proceed without prepaying them.

Who this affects

Vuth Nguyen, who must either pay the $402 in fees or submit a completed amended application within 30 days to avoid dismissal of the action.

What happened

In Nguyen v. N/A-Crime, Vuth Nguyen filed the action without a lawyer and asked to proceed without paying the filing fees upfront.

Nguyen's application showed that he was not presently employed but left the remaining questions unanswered. The court therefore could not determine whether he was unable to pay the required $402 in fees.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered Nguyen to pay the fees or submit a completed application within 30 days. The court said the action would be dismissed if he did not comply, and no summons would issue at that time.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Nguyen v. N/A-Crime · No. 1:22-cv-10240
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Dec. 7, 2022

Background

Vuth Nguyen brought this civil action without a lawyer. To proceed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, he had to either pay $402 in filing and administrative fees or submit a signed application to proceed without prepaying those fees.

Application for fee waiver

Nguyen submitted an application to proceed without prepaying fees, but he answered only that he was not presently employed and left the remaining questions unanswered. Because the application was incomplete and Nguyen provided no other information about his financial circumstances, the court could not conclude that he was unable to afford the fees.

Order

The court ordered Nguyen, within 30 days of the order, either to pay the $402 in fees or submit an amended application. The amended application had to include facts establishing that he could not pay the fees, answer all applicable questions, and identify docket number 22-CV-10240 (LTS). If the court granted the amended application, Nguyen would be allowed to proceed without prepaying the fees.

No summons would issue at that time. The court stated that the action would be dismissed if Nguyen failed to comply within the permitted time. The court also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-waiver status for purposes of an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.