Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 8, 2022

Toxqui v. The Jade Farm LLC

Judge
Gregory Woods
Docket
1:22-cv-07899
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
DiscoveryArbitrationCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Toxqui v. The Jade Farm LLC, Judge Woods granted limited discovery on contract formation and stayed the request to seek arbitration.

Who this affects

The parties, including Jose Luis Toxqui, The Jade Farm LLC, and the other defendants, are affected by the limited discovery schedule and the stay of the request to seek arbitration.

What happened

In Toxqui v. The Jade Farm LLC, Jose Luis Toxqui proposed limited discovery about whether the parties formed a contract before the court considered a request to compel arbitration.

The court ordered the parties to exchange required disclosures within 14 days, respond to document requests or written questions within 21 days, and finish discovery by February 27, 2023. The parties must then submit a joint update addressing the remaining factual and trial-related issues.

Judge Gregory H. Woods granted the proposed limited discovery and stayed the defendant’s request for permission to file a motion to compel arbitration until the contract-formation issue is resolved.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Toxqui v. The Jade Farm LLC · No. 1:22-cv-07899
Judge
Gregory Woods
Date
Dec. 8, 2022

Background

Jose Luis Toxqui brought the case on behalf of himself and others similarly situated against The Jade Farm LLC, doing business as Jue Lan Club, and other defendants. The order concerns whether the parties formed a contract, a factual issue relevant to the defendant’s request for permission to file a motion asking the court to require arbitration.

Court’s ruling

The court granted Toxqui’s proposal to conduct limited discovery on contract formation before considering any motion to compel arbitration. The parties must exchange disclosures under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 within 14 days of the order. They have 21 days to respond to requests for documents or written questions, and discovery on contract formation must conclude by February 27, 2023.

The court also directed the parties to provide a joint status update no later than one week after discovery closes. The update must address whether the contract-formation question should be decided by a judge or jury; whether the parties would consent to a judge deciding it if it is a jury question; and whether they would consent to a magistrate judge deciding it if appropriate. The court stayed the defendant’s request for permission to file a motion to compel arbitration until the factual issue is resolved.

Additional note

The court noted its expectation that Toxqui’s counsel would present an affirmation from Toxqui sufficient to raise a factual dispute about contract formation by the disclosure deadline. This order sets discovery and pauses the arbitration request; it does not decide whether a contract was formed or whether arbitration will ultimately be required.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.