Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 7, 2022

Pierre v. United States

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:22-cv-08704
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Pierre v. United States, Judge Swain administratively closed the case because Pierre neither paid filing fees nor requested to proceed without prepayment.

Who this affects

Katheline Pierre, who brought the action without a lawyer and must satisfy the payment or fee-waiver requirements to reopen it.

What happened

In Pierre v. United States, Katheline Pierre filed a complaint and sent a $402 check to cover the filing and administrative fees. The check was returned unpaid because the account lacked sufficient funds, and Pierre had not submitted a request to proceed without prepaying fees.

The court directed the Clerk to administratively close the case. Pierre may seek to reopen it within 14 days by paying a $53 insufficient-funds fee and either submitting a completed application showing she cannot afford the costs or paying the $402 filing fee.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain said the case would be reopened and screened if Pierre complied. If she did not, the case would remain closed. The court also denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees on appeal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Pierre v. United States · No. 1:22-cv-08704
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Dec. 7, 2022

Background

Katheline Pierre brought the action without a lawyer. The opinion's caption identifies the defendant as "United States Federal Agency of Deposit Insurance Corporation." To start a civil case in the Southern District of New York, a plaintiff must pay $402 in filing and administrative fees or submit a signed application to proceed without prepaying those fees, commonly called an in forma pauperis application.

Pierre submitted a complaint with a $402 check, and the court issued a summons. The check was later returned unpaid because the account did not have enough funds. The court therefore found that Pierre had neither paid the required fees nor submitted an application to proceed without prepayment. The opinion also notes that the court accepted the payment as an attorney check because it was labeled with the name "attorney-at-law MuyasiMpiences PLLC."

Ruling

The court ordered the Clerk of Court to administratively close the action because Pierre had not paid the filing fees or requested permission to proceed without prepayment. The court stated that no answer from the defendant was required at that time.

To reopen the action, Pierre must, within 14 days, pay the $53 insufficient-funds fee identified by the court's Finance Unit. She must also either submit a completed application to proceed without prepayment and show that she cannot afford the costs of the lawsuit, or pay the $402 filing fee in cash or by money order. The order states that all fees may be paid in one $455 money order.

If Pierre complies, the case will be reopened and screened under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). If she does not comply within the allowed period, the action will remain closed. Judge Laura Taylor Swain also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.