Banton v. United Cerebral Palsy Associations Of New York State, Inc.
- Gabriel Gorenstein
- 1:22-cv-08338
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Banton v. United Cerebral Palsy Associations, Judge Gorenstein ordered the parties to justify their Fair Labor Standards Act settlement.
The plaintiff, Shackeema Banton, and the defendant, United Cerebral Palsy Associations Of New York State, Inc., were required to provide the court with information about their settlement.
What happened
Banton v. United Cerebral Palsy Associations Of New York State, Inc. involves claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The court required the parties to submit a joint letter or motion about whether their settlement is fair and reasonable.
The filing must discuss the claims and defenses, potential damages, the strengths and weaknesses of each side’s case, the settlement negotiations, and any reasons the settlement amount differs from the potential value of the claims. It must also include the fee arrangement, the retainer agreement, information about fees already spent, and the settlement agreement itself.
The parties must file the required materials by January 10, 2023. Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein issued the order on December 13, 2022; the order did not approve or reject the settlement.
The detailed version
- Banton v. United Cerebral Palsy Associations Of New York State, Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-08338
- Gabriel Gorenstein
- Dec. 13, 2022
Background
The opinion states that the case includes one or more claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal law governing matters such as minimum wages and overtime. The parties had reached a settlement that required court review under the Second Circuit’s decision in Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc.
Order
The court ordered the parties to file a joint letter or motion addressing whether the settlement is fair and reasonable. The filing must address:
- the claims and defenses; - the defendant’s potential monetary exposure and the basis for those calculations; - the strengths and weaknesses of the plaintiff’s case and the defendant’s defenses; - any other factors explaining a difference between the potential value of the claims and the settlement amount; - the litigation and negotiation process; and - other issues relevant to whether the settlement is reasonable, including whether a judgment would be collectible if the case went to trial.
The parties must also disclose their attorney-fee arrangement, attach the retainer agreement, provide information about actual attorney’s fees spent, and attach the settlement agreement.
Disposition
The required joint letter or motion was due January 10, 2023. The order required information for the court’s review but did not approve or reject the settlement and did not decide the underlying claims. Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein issued the order.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.