Morse v. Warren & Panzer Engineers, P.C.
- Robert Lehrburger
- 1:22-cv-03879
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Morse v. Warren & Panzer Engineers, P.C., Judge Lehrburger approved the FLSA settlement and dismissed the case with prejudice.
James Morse, Warren & Panzer Engineers, and the other defendants in the case; the settlement approval and dismissal ended the entire action.
What happened
In Morse v. Warren & Panzer Engineers, P.C., James Morse brought claims for damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law. The parties jointly asked the court to approve their settlement.
The court reviewed the agreement and found it fair, reasonable, and reached through negotiations between the parties. It considered the risks and costs of continuing the case, possible recovery, attorney fees, and potential fraud or collusion, among other factors.
Judge Robert W. Lehrburger approved the settlement and dismissed and discontinued the entire case with prejudice, without costs or fees to any party except as provided in the settlement agreement. The court also directed the Clerk to terminate pending motions and deadlines and close the case.
The detailed version
- Morse v. Warren & Panzer Engineers, P.C. · No. 1:22-cv-03879
- Robert Lehrburger
- Dec. 15, 2022
Background
James Morse sued Warren & Panzer Engineers and other defendants for damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), a federal law governing certain wage and hour requirements, and the New York Labor Law. The parties jointly asked the court to approve their settlement agreement. They submitted a fully signed agreement on December 14, 2022.
Settlement review
The court explained that it had to determine whether the FLSA settlement was fair and reasonable and resulted from arm’s-length negotiations rather than employer overreaching. The court reviewed the agreement and the parties’ letter, considering the prior proceedings, the risks, burdens, and costs of continuing the case, the possible recovery, whether the agreement resulted from negotiations between experienced counsel or the parties, attorney fees, and the possibility of fraud or collusion.
The court noted that the agreement contained no confidentiality restrictions, that its non-disparagement provision was mutual and included appropriate exceptions, that its release was narrowly limited to wage and hour claims, and that the attorney fees fell within a fair and reasonable range.
Ruling
The court found the settlement fair and reasonable and approved it. Because the case was resolved by settlement, the court dismissed and discontinued it in its entirety, with prejudice, without costs or fees to any party except as provided in the settlement agreement. The Clerk of Court was directed to terminate all motions and deadlines and close the case.
Judge Robert W. Lehrburger issued the order.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.